期刊文献+

论信息公开诉讼中行政机关的举证责任——涉及第三人权益的分析 被引量:3

On the Burden of Proof of Administration in Administrative Litigation of Governmental Information Disclosure——Analysis involved Rights and Interests of Third Party
下载PDF
导出
摘要 若政府信息涉及到第三人权益,行政机关在行政诉讼中的举证责任有必要进一步厘清,这其中既涉及到第三人权益的认定、征求意见程序的履行,又涉及到第三人权益与公共利益的衡量。涉及第三人权益与侵害第三人权益意涵不同,应慎重借用信息公开条例以外的其他法律规范的相关概念。第三人的意见仅具有程序保障的意义,行政机关仍需在最终的决定中说明理由。行政机关还应就是否涉及公共利益、公共利益与第三人利益的衡量承担举证责任。 If governmental information is related to rights and interests of third party, the burden of proof of administration in administrative litigation is necessary to be further clarified, which involves identification of interests of third party, fulfillment of consultation and interest balance between third party and the public.Involving is different from infringement, and related concepts should be carefully borrowed from other legal norms of public information outside of the ordinance. The third views has only a procedural protection significance, administrative organs still need to explain the reasons in the final decision, including specific feedback on opinions of third party. The burden of proof shall lie upon administration, including whether involving public interests, interest balance between public interest and the interests of third party.
作者 伏创宇
出处 《湖南警察学院学报》 2015年第1期80-86,共7页 Journal of Hunan Police Academy
基金 2013年北京市社科联青年社科人才资助项目"北京市信息公开的实践评估及制度完善"(2013SKL043)
关键词 信息公开 第三人 举证责任 利益衡量 disclosure of governmental information third party burden of proof interest balance
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

二级参考文献125

共引文献202

同被引文献22

引证文献3

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部