期刊文献+

Sensory innervation around immediately vs. delayed loaded implants: a pilot study 被引量:7

Sensory innervation around immediately vs. delayed loaded implants: a pilot study
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Although neurophysiological and psychophysical proof of osseoperception is accumulating, histomorphometric evidence for the neural mechanisms of functional compensation following immediate and delayed implant loading is still lacking. For this randomized split-mouth study, six mongrel dogs randomly received one of four treatment protocols at 36 implant-recipient sites over 16 weeks (third maxillary incisor, third and fourth mandibular premolar): immediate implant placement and immediate loading (liP+ IL); delayed implant placement and delayed loading (DIP+DL); delayed implant placement and immediate loading (DIP+IL); and natural extraction socket healing (control). Histomorphometry was performed in the peri-implant bone and soft tissues within 300 pm around the implants. Immunocytochemistry and transmission electron microscopy were used to confirm the presence of neural structures and to reveal their ultrastructural characteristics, respectively. Myelinated nerve fibres densely populated the peri-implant crestal gingival and apical regions, although they were also identified in the woven bone and in the osteons near the implant threads. Compared with the control group in the mandible, the group that received IIP+IL showed a higher innervation (in N.mm^-2, 5.94±1.12 vs. 3.15±0.63, P〈0.001) and smaller fibre diameter (in pm, 1.37±0.05 vs. 1.64±0.13, P=0.016), smaller axon diameter (in pm, 0.89±0.05 vs. 1.24±0,10, P=0.009) and g-ratio (0.64±0.04 vs. 0.76±0.05, P〈0.001) in the middle region around the implants. Compared with DIP+IL in the mandible, IIP+IL had a higher nerve density (in N.mm^-2, 13.23±2.54 vs. 9.64±1.86, P=0.027), greater fibre diameter (in pm, 1.32±0.02 vs. 1.20±0.04, P=0.021), greater axon diameter (in μm, 0.92±0.01 vs. 0.89±0.03, P=-0.035) and lower g-ratio (0.69±0.01 vs. 0.74±0.01, P=-0.033) in the apical region around the implants. It may be assumed that the treatment protocol with liP+ IL is the preferred method to allow optimized peri-implant re-innervation, but further functional measurements are still required. Although neurophysiological and psychophysical proof of osseoperception is accumulating, histomorphometric evidence for the neural mechanisms of functional compensation following immediate and delayed implant loading is still lacking. For this randomized split-mouth study, six mongrel dogs randomly received one of four treatment protocols at 36 implant-recipient sites over 16 weeks (third maxillary incisor, third and fourth mandibular premolar): immediate implant placement and immediate loading (liP+ IL); delayed implant placement and delayed loading (DIP+DL); delayed implant placement and immediate loading (DIP+IL); and natural extraction socket healing (control). Histomorphometry was performed in the peri-implant bone and soft tissues within 300 pm around the implants. Immunocytochemistry and transmission electron microscopy were used to confirm the presence of neural structures and to reveal their ultrastructural characteristics, respectively. Myelinated nerve fibres densely populated the peri-implant crestal gingival and apical regions, although they were also identified in the woven bone and in the osteons near the implant threads. Compared with the control group in the mandible, the group that received IIP+IL showed a higher innervation (in N.mm^-2, 5.94±1.12 vs. 3.15±0.63, P〈0.001) and smaller fibre diameter (in pm, 1.37±0.05 vs. 1.64±0.13, P=0.016), smaller axon diameter (in pm, 0.89±0.05 vs. 1.24±0,10, P=0.009) and g-ratio (0.64±0.04 vs. 0.76±0.05, P〈0.001) in the middle region around the implants. Compared with DIP+IL in the mandible, IIP+IL had a higher nerve density (in N.mm^-2, 13.23±2.54 vs. 9.64±1.86, P=0.027), greater fibre diameter (in pm, 1.32±0.02 vs. 1.20±0.04, P=0.021), greater axon diameter (in μm, 0.92±0.01 vs. 0.89±0.03, P=-0.035) and lower g-ratio (0.69±0.01 vs. 0.74±0.01, P=-0.033) in the apical region around the implants. It may be assumed that the treatment protocol with liP+ IL is the preferred method to allow optimized peri-implant re-innervation, but further functional measurements are still required.
出处 《International Journal of Oral Science》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2015年第1期49-55,共7页 国际口腔科学杂志(英文版)
基金 supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (81000459) the Chinese Scholarship Council
关键词 animal experiments dental implants HISTOMORPHOMETRY immediate loading MECHANORECEPTOR myelinated nerve fibres osseoperception animal experiments dental implants histomorphometry immediate loading mechanoreceptor myelinated nerve fibres osseoperception
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献12

  • 1Linden RW, Scott BJ. The effect of tooth extraction on periodontal ligament meehanoreeeptors represented in the mesencephalie nucleus of the eat[J]. Arch Oral Biol, 1989.34(12):937-941.
  • 2Bonte B, Linden RW. Scott B J, et al. Role of periodontal mechanoreceptors in evoking reflexes in the jaw-closing muscles of the cat[J]. J Physiol, 1993.465:581-594.
  • 3Batista M, Bonachela W, Soares J. Progressive recovery of osseoperception as a function of the combination of implant- supported prostheses [J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2008 ,19(6): 565-569.
  • 4Jacobs R, Van Steenberghe D. From osseoperception to implant- mediated sensory -motor interactions and related clinical implications[J]. J Oral Rehabil, 2006, 33(4):282-292.
  • 5Doppen P, Solomons M, Kritzinger S. Osseointegrated finger prostheses[J]. J Hand Surg Eur Vol, 2009.34(1):29-34.
  • 6Abarca M. Van Steenberghe D, Malevez C, et al. The neurophysiology of osseointegrated oral implants. A clinicaly underestimated aspect[J]. J Oral Rehabil, 2006 , 33(3):161-169.
  • 7Dong WK, Shiwaku T, Kawakami Y, et al. Static and dynamic responses of periodontal ligament mechanoreceptors and intradental mechanoreceptors [J]. J Neurophysiol,1993 , 69(5): 1567-1582.
  • 8Klineberg I, Murray G. Osseoperception: sensory function and proprioception[J]. Adv Dent Res, 1999,13:120-129.
  • 9Van Loven K, Jacobs R, Swinnen A, et al. Sensations and trigeminal somatosensory-evoked potentials elicited by electrical stimulation of endosseous oral implants in humans [J]. Arch Oral Biol, 2000,45(12):1083-1090.
  • 10Weiner S, Sirois D, Ehrenberg D, et al. Sensory responses from loading of implants: a pilot study [J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2004,19(1):44-51.

共引文献11

同被引文献16

引证文献7

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部