期刊文献+

审判权运行机制去行政化路径探索 被引量:2

A Probe into the Operation of Judicial Mechanism without Bureaucratic Administrative Procedure
下载PDF
导出
摘要 审判权运行机制改革是我国新一轮司法改革的重点。当前审判权运行机制行政化主要表现在案件审批制度行政化、法官地位行政化、上下级法院关系行政化等方面。审判权运行机制行政化降低了审判效率、影响法官独立行使审判权、不利于司法公正的实现、不利于构建健康的审级监督关系,造成"作出裁判的人不审理案件,审理案件的人无权裁判"。审判权运行机制去行政化要着力于转变思想观念,提高"去行政化"认识;完善审判权运行机制;以司法公开为手段,监督审判权独立公正运行;完善配套措施,约束和保障法官独立司法这四个方面推进审判权运行机制改革。 The reform of the operation of the judicial mechanism is the focus of a new round of judicial re-form in China.Currently,the administration of the operation of judicial mechanism refers mainly to the adminis-trative examination and approval system for the judicial cases,the administration of the status of the judge,the administration of the relationship between the upper court and the lower one,and the like.The bureaucratic ad-ministrative procedure of the operation of judicial mechanism has reduced the trial efficiency,and affected the in-dependent exercise of judicial power by the judge.It is not conducive to the realization of justice,and not condu-cive to the building of a healthy relationship between trial and supervision.As a result,it will lead to the situa-tion in which “those who render a final decision will not hear the case,and those who hear the case will have no right to judge”.To realize the operation of judicial mechanism without the interference from administrative proce-dure challenges the reform in four aspects:the change of traditional concept,and the raising of the consciousness of “removing bureaucratic administrative procedure”;the perfection of the judicial operation mechanism;the conducting of independent and impartial judicial supervision under the condition of maintaining open justice as a means;and the completion of supporting measures so as to restrict and safeguard the independence of judges.
出处 《贵州大学学报(社会科学版)》 2015年第1期148-153,共6页 Journal of Guizhou University(Social Sciences)
关键词 司法改革 审判权 法院 法官 去行政化 judicial reform jurisdiction courts judges the removal of bureaucratic administrative proce-dure
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1江平.[蓟门决策58期:新形势下司法改革与中国法治愿景]实录[EB/OL].[2014-08-19].http://blog.sina.com.cn/Jblog_684c4e0101cyhz.html.
  • 2丁永勋.“去行政化”的精髓是规范行政权力[EB/OL].[2014- 08 - 10 ]. http ://news. xinhuanet, corn/politics/2010 - 06/08/c 12194267. htm,.
  • 3许晓平.“权力相对”现象与组织行政化[EB/OL].[2014-08-10].人民网http://theory.people.com.en/GB/49150/49152/9179940.html.
  • 4江平.2014,依然“谨慎的乐观”[EB/OL].[2014-08-19].新浪网http://news.sina.eom.cn/c/z/2014qglh/sibian2.html.

同被引文献15

  • 1贺卫方.中国司法管理制度的两个问题[J].中国社会科学,1997(6):116-129. 被引量:278
  • 2贺小荣.人民法院四五改革纲要的理论基点、逻辑结构和实现路径[N].人民法院报,2014-7-16(5).
  • 3刘铮.公正是法官的基本品质[N].人民法院报,2016-04-13(02).
  • 4胡云腾.司法的基本方式是解释法律[N].法制日报,2013-10-19(09).
  • 5李阳.深耕“试验田” 做好“先行者”[N].人民法院报,2015-10-26(01).
  • 6孙海龙.让司法责任制改革落地生根[N].人民法院报,2015-08-06(05).
  • 7贺小荣.如何牵住司法责任制这个牛鼻子[N].人民法院报,2015-09-25(05).
  • 8张婷婷.论司法改革中审判权运行机制的构建[J].法制博览,2016,(1).
  • 9顾培东.再论人民法院审判权运行机制的构建[J].中国法学,2014(5):284-302. 被引量:99
  • 10蒋惠岭.论审判权运行机制改革[J].北京行政学院学报,2015(2):1-5. 被引量:20

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部