脊椎矫正枪技术修复骨骼组织细胞产生拉应力及压应力的作用

Chiropractic e-Impulse therapy repairs osteoblasts and produces tensile and compressive stresses

背景:研究报道,美式脊椎矫正枪智能器械手替代传统推拿治疗非特异性下腰痛所致腰部运动功能障碍,具有较好的临床疗效。目的:比较脊椎矫正枪与传统推拿治疗非特异性腰痛所致腰部运动功能障碍的疗效和安全性,为脊椎矫正枪技术产生的拉应力和压应力作用应用于非特异性腰痛所致腰部运动功能障碍的康复提供依据。方法:选取78例非特异性腰痛患者,用随机数字法将其随机分为治疗组(采用脊椎矫正枪治疗,n=39)与对照组(采用传统推拿治疗,n=39);两组治疗2周后均要求进行腰肌体操功能锻炼。所有患者治疗前、治疗4周后进行选用目测类比评分法和Oswestry功能障碍指数对非特异性腰痛患者疼痛和运动功能障碍进行客观评定;以及临床治愈率和安全性对比。结果与结论:两组患者治疗4周后目测类比评分和Oswestry功能障碍指数与治疗前比较均有改善(P<0.01),治疗4周后治疗组患者目测类比评分和Oswestry功能障碍指数与对照组比较改善显著(P<0.01)。说明脊椎矫正枪治疗非特异性腰痛所致运动功能障碍疗效优于传统推拿。临床治愈率治疗组显著优于对照组(P<0.01),且治疗师工作强度降低和效率提高明显优于传统推拿。所有患者均未出现不良反应。结果表明,脊椎矫正枪治疗可在不同密度组织间产生能量梯度差及扭拉力,尤其是在骨与肌腱、骨与软组织之间及骨组织内部产生一系列物理效应,可以迅速解除非特异性腰痛所致腰痛和腰部运动功能障碍,能够提高治疗师工作效率和减少对治疗师手腕关节的损害;也证实了脊椎矫正枪智能器械手替代传统推拿疗效显著,具有可行性和安全性。

BACKGROUND： American spinal corrective electric gun intelligent instrument hand, alternative to traditional massage, in treatment of nonspecific low back pain-induced waist motor dysfunction has good clinical effects. OBJECTIVE： To compare the efficacy and safety of chiropractic e-tmputse therapy versus traditional massage in treatment of nonspecific low back pain-induced waist motor dysfunction so as to provide basic evidence for clinical treatment on the nonspecific low back pain using spinal corrective electric gun. METHODS： A total of 78 patients with nonspecific low back pain were randomly divided into two groups： a treatment group （n=39） treated with chiropractic e-Impulse therapy, and a control group （n=39） treated with traditional massage. Both groups were given lumber functional exercises after 2 weeks of treatment. Before and after 4 weeks of treatment, the Visual Analogue Scale and Oswestry Disability Index were used to assess patients with nonspecific low back pain. The clinical cure rate and safety were compared. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION： At 4 weeks after treatment, the Visual Analogue Scale and Oswestry Disability Index were better in two groups when compared with those before the treatment （P 〈 0.01 ）. The Visual Analogue Scale and Oswestry Disability Index were significantly improved in the treatment compared with the control group at 4 weeks after treatment （P 〈 0.01 ）. The clinical effects of chiropractic e-impulse therapy were superior to that of the traditional massage in treatment of nonspecific low back pain-induced motor dysfunction. The healing rate was significantly better in the treatment group than in the control group （P 〈 0.01）. Moreover, the work intensity of the therapist was reduced and the eff^ciency was greatly improved. None of the patients affected adverse reaction. Above data suggested that the chiropractic e-Impulse therapy in the nonspecific low back pain and lumbar motor dysfunction is clear and secure that can produce energy gradient difference and twisting tension between different tissue densities, especially between bone and tendon, between bone and soft tissue, and inside bone tissue, and produce a series of physical effects. Chiropractic e-Impulse therapy can greatly improve the efficiency and reduce wrist injury to the therapist. Chiropractic e-Impulse, alternative to traditional massage, is effective, feasible and safe.