期刊文献+

论刑事庭审实质化 被引量:232

Making Criminal Trials Substantive
原文传递
导出
摘要 刑事庭审实质化是"以审判为中心的诉讼制度改革"的基本要求,其内核是被告人的刑事责任在审判阶段通过庭审方式解决。在一些地方的司法实践中,逮捕"绑架"审判,审理方式以审查案卷笔录为主,庭前会议实体化,以及法庭审理仅以定罪为中心,均在一定程度上虚置刑事审判程序,使其流于形式。在构建庭审中心裁判机制以及落实"权责一致"办案责任制的背景下,有必要消除庭审虚化的成因,建构审判中心主义的诉讼结构,实现直接言词原则的庭审方式,合理定位庭前会议功能,调整定罪与量刑并重的庭审内容,在诉讼制度层面实现我国刑事审判程序的实质化。 Making criminal trials substantive is a basic requirement of 'trial-centered procedural reform.' The core issue is that the defendant's criminal liability should be resolved at the trial stage.In the course of judicial practice,arrest 'forced' trial,conducting the trial primarily through the investigation of case documents and transcripts,making the pre-trial meeting substantive,and making the trial focus on conviction alone,all to some extent weaken criminal trial procedure and make it a mere formality.In the context of constructing a judicial system in which the trial is central and there is parity of authority and responsibility,it is necessary to eliminate the factors weakening the trial system,develop a trial-centered litigation structure,realize the principle of direct oral evidence as a trial method,provide a rational orientation for the function of the pre-trial meeting,fine-tune the trial content of laying equal stress on conviction and sentencing,and make Chinese criminal trial procedure substantive at the level of litigation.
作者 汪海燕
出处 《中国社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第2期103-122,204-205,共20页 Social Sciences in China
基金 司法部国家法治与法学理论研究课题"刑事诉讼法解释研究"(12SFB3017)阶段性成果 中国政法大学刑事法学创新团队和中青年教师培养支持计划资助项目资助
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

共引文献597

同被引文献2164

引证文献232

二级引证文献1272

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部