期刊文献+

打开奖励的“薛定谔黑箱”:认知学派与行为学派的理论分野与整合 被引量:13

Opening Schr?dinger Black Box of Rewards:Theoretical Distinction and Integration between Cognition and Behavior Schools
原文传递
导出
摘要 对经典激励理论的拉卡托斯批判揭示,在奖励与其行为结果之间横亘着一个社会心理"黑箱"。以Deci为代表的认知学派与以Eisenberger为代表的行为学派对奖励效果的论争长达二十多年。观点的对立不仅阻滞了理论的发展,也导致了实践者的无所适从。本文整合演化心理学和神经经济学观点,在厘清二者理论分野的基础上,从奖励的双重性和双路径动机性信息加工过程出发,引入角色知觉与认知框架,构建了一个整合的多路径模型,力图演绎和还原两种理论的冲突过程,并为整合和深化两种理论、提高奖励效果提出一系列假说。 The Lakatos' criticism of classic incentive theories reveals that there exists a "black box" of social psychology between rewards and behavior outcomes. However, the de- bate about reward consequences between cognition school represented by Deci and behavior school represented by Eisenberger has been lasting for almost two decades. These two con- tradictory views not only restrict the theoretical development, but also make the practitioners bewildered. This paper integrates the views of evolutionary psychology and neuro-economics to identify the theoretical divergence of these two schools, and introduces role perception and cognition framework based on the dual nature of rewards and dual-path motivated informa- tion processing to construct an integrated multi-path model. It tries to deduce and recuperate the conflict processes of these two opposite theories,and puts forward a series of hypotheses for the integration and deepening of these two theories and the improvement of reward conse- quences.
出处 《外国经济与管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第3期27-39,共13页 Foreign Economics & Management
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(10YJC630178) 上海市哲学社会科学规划项目(2013BGL015) 上海市教育科学项目(B12026) 上海市教育委员会创新项目(12YS001)
关键词 奖励 激励效应 薛定谔黑箱 认知学派 行为学派 reward incentive effect Schr6dinger black box cognition school behavior school
  • 相关文献

参考文献27

  • 1Amabile T M, Barsade S G, Mueller J S and Staw B M. Affect and creativity at work[J]. Administrative Science Quarter- ly,2005,50(3) 367--403.
  • 2Anderson N,Poto6nik K and Zhou J. Innovation and creativity in organizations a state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework[J ]. Journal of Management, 2014,40 (5) : 1297 -- 1333.
  • 3Baas M, Roskes M, Sligte D, Nijstad B A and De Dreu C K W. Personality and creativity: The dual pathway to creativity model and a research agenda[J]. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2013,7 (10) : 732-- 748.
  • 4Bowles S and Polania-Reyes S. Economic incentives and social preferences: Substitutes or complements? [J]. Journal of Economic Literature,2012,50(2) : 368--425.
  • 5De Dreu C K W,Nijstad B A and Van Knippenberg D. Motivated information processing in group judgment and decision making[J]. Personality and Social Psychology Review,2008,12(1): 22--49.
  • 6De Dreu C K W,Nijstad B A and Baas M. Behavioral activation links to creativity because of increased cognitive flexibility [J]. Social Psychological and Personality Science,2011a,2(1): 7--80.
  • 7De Dreu C K W,Niistad B A,Bechtoldt M N and Baas M. Group creativity and innovation: A motivated information pro- cessing perspective[J]. Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts, 201 lh, 5 (1) :81 -- 89.
  • 8Deci E L,Koestner R and Ryan R M. A recta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation[J]. Psychological Bulletin, 1999,125 (6) .. 627--668.
  • 9Dysvik A and Kuvaas B. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation as predictors of work effort: The moderating role of achieve- ment goals[J]. British Journal of Social Psychology,2013,52(3): 412--430.
  • 10Eisenberger R,Pierce W D and Cameron J. Effects of reward on intrinsic motivation: Negative, neutral, and positive[J]. Psychological Bulletin, 1999,125(6) : 677--691.

同被引文献202

引证文献13

二级引证文献96

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部