期刊文献+

基于工作投入与核心自我评价视角的辱虐管理与员工主动行为研究 被引量:39

Abusive Supervision and Subordinate Proactive Behavior:Exploring the Effects of Work Engagement and Core Self-Evaluations
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于自我决定理论和行为弹性理论,深入研究了辱虐管理为何以及怎样影响员工的主动行为。研究结果表明,主管的辱虐管理对员工的主动行为具有显著的负向影响,而工作投入在辱虐管理与主动行为的关系中起着完全中介作用,即辱虐管理会降低员工在工作中的投入,继而减少了主动行为。同时,核心自我评价会削弱辱虐管理的直接效应和工作投入的间接效应,即相对于低核心自我评价的员工,高核心自我评价的员工较少因为主管的辱虐管理而降低其工作投入,进而较少减少主动行为。 Employee proactive behavior is vital to an enterprise's survival and development, which has been an emerging research field of employee behavior in the workplace. However, there are few studies to explore employee proactive behavior both in the contexts of Chinese enterprises and western enterprise, especially in the context of Chinese enterprises. Drawing on the self-determination theory and behavioral plasticity theory, this study presents a motivational model to examine the influence of abusive supervision on employee proactive behavior. The empirical results indicated that abusive su- pervision is significantly and negatively related to employee proactive behavior, and this relationship is fully mediated by employee work engagement. Specifically, abusive supervision decreases subordi nates' levels of work engagement, and consequently leads to less proactive behaviors. This study also found that core self-evaluations attenuate the main effect of abusive supervision and the indirect effect of work engagement on employee proactive behavior.
出处 《管理学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第3期347-354,共8页 Chinese Journal of Management
基金 国家自然科学基金资助重点项目(71332002)
关键词 员工主动行为 辱虐管理 工作投入 核心自我评价 proactive behavior abusive supervision work engagement core sel{-evaluations
  • 相关文献

参考文献31

  • 1BINDL U K, PARKER S K. Proactive Work Behav- ior: Forward-Thinking and Change-Oriented Action in Organizations[R]// ZEDECK S. APA Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Wash- ington: American Psychological Association, 2010.
  • 2FRESE M, FAY D, HILBURGER T, et al. The Concept of Personal Initiative: Operationalization, Reliability and Validity in Two German Samples[J]. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychol- ogy, 1997, 70(2):139-161.
  • 3GRANT A M, ASHFORD S J. The Dynamics of Proactivity at Work[J]. Research in Organizational Behavior, 2008, 28(2): 5-34.
  • 4PARKER S K, BINDL U K, STRAUSS K. Making Things Happen: A Model of Proactive Motivation [J]. Journal of Management, 2010, 36(4): 827- 856.
  • 5DEN HARTOG D N,BELSCHAK F D. When Does Transformational Leadership Enhance Employee Pro active Behavior? The Role of Autonomy and Role Breadth Self-Efficacy[J]. Journal of Applied Psychol- ogy, 2012, 97(1):194-202.
  • 6JANSSEN O, VAN YPEREN N W. Employees' Goal Orientations, the Quality of Leader-Member Ex change, and the Outcomes of Job Performance and Job Satisfaction[J]. Academy of Management Jour nal, 2004,47 (3):368-384.
  • 7TEPPER B J. Abusive Supervision in Work Organi zations: Review, Synthesis, and Research Agenda [J] Journal of Management, 2007, S3(3): 261- 289.
  • 8MARTINKO M J, HARVEY P, BREES J R, et al. A Review of Abusive Supervision Research[J]. Jour- nal of Organizational Behavior, 2013, 34(sl): 120- 137.
  • 9PARKER S K, WILLIAMS H M, TURNER N. Modeling the Antecedents of Proactive Behavior at Work[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2006, 91(3): 636-652.
  • 10GRIFFIN M A, PARKER S K, MASON C M. Leader Vision and the Development of Adaptive and Proactive Performance: A Longitudinal Study[J],Journal of Applied Psychology, 2010, 95(1) : 174- 182.

二级参考文献92

共引文献228

同被引文献442

引证文献39

二级引证文献241

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部