期刊文献+

消费者矛盾性对正面在线口碑信息处理的影响 被引量:15

How Customers' Ambivalence Affects Their Processing of Positive Online Word-of-Mouth
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在线购物的非实体性使消费者态度具有突出的矛盾性。通过两个实验针对不同消费者群体和目标商品,采用2(高矛盾性,低矛盾性)×2(主观性正面口碑,客观性正面口碑)的组间实验,探索消费者在线购物时初步态度矛盾性对于消费者进行正面口碑信息的处理方式和口碑说服力的影响。研究结果显示,初步态度高矛盾性的个体(相对于初步态度低矛盾性的个体)的信息量阈值更高,投入更多努力,采取更多系统式处理方式;面对相同的正面口碑信息,却更难以降低其矛盾性;对于正面口碑信息的主客观性特征更为敏感。同时,客观性正面口碑比主观性正面口碑对于降低个体态度矛盾性的作用更大。 Online purchase brings more ambivalence to customers' attitude due to the fact that customers can not observe the products directly by themselves before they pay. This study conducted two lab experiments with a 2 (high ambivalence vs. low ambivalence) ×2 (subjective word-of-mouth vs. objective word-of-mouth) design to examine how the ambivalence of attitudes of online shopping customers affects their word-of-mouth processing efforts and the persuasive power of positive reviews to them. It is found that online customers with higher ambivalence in their initial attitude have higher information sufficiency threshold, and adopt more systematic processing with more effort, but are more reluctant to reduce their ambivalence facing positive reviews. It is also found that objective word-of-mouth has more power to reduce customers' ambivalence than subjective word-of-mouth does, and online customers with higher ambivalent attitude are more sensitive to the subjective attrib utes of reviews. The findings remind the B2C businesses to find ways to guide customers to comment in the more objective way as well as accumulating positive reviews.
出处 《管理学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第3期446-457,共12页 Chinese Journal of Management
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71371081) 教育部博士点(博导类)基金资助项目(20130142110044)
关键词 在线口碑 矛盾性 启发式-系统式模型 online word-of-mouth ambivalence heuristic-systematic model
  • 相关文献

参考文献32

  • 1OTNES C, LOWREY T M, SHRUM I. J. Toward an Understanding of Consumer Ambivalence[J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 1997, 24(1): 80-93.
  • 2黄敏学,谢亭亭,冯小亮.矛盾的消费者是如何解读多元化口碑信息的?[J].心理学报,2010,42(10):998-1010. 被引量:41
  • 3CHENG F F, LIU T Y, WU C S. Perceived Risks and Risk Reduction Strategies in Online Group-Buy- ing[C]//Diversity, Technology, and Innovation for Operational Competitiveness: Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Technology Innovation and Industrial Management. Toknow press, 2013 (sl) :18-25.
  • 4ZEMBORAIN M R, JOHAR G V. Attitudinal Am bivalence and Openness to Persuasion: A Framework for Interpersonal Influence[J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 2007, 33(4): 506-514.
  • 5WIEN A H, OLSEN S O. Evaluation Context's Role in Driving Positive Word of Mouth Intentions[J]. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 2012, 11 (6): 504-513.
  • 6PRIESTER J R, PETTY R E. The Gradual Thresh- old Model of Ambivalence: Relating the Positive and Negative Bases of Attitudes to Subjective Ambiva- lence[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychol- ogy, 1996, 71(3): 431-449.
  • 7LAU-GESK L. Understanding Consumer Evaluations of Mixed Affective Experiences[J]. Journal of Con- sumer Research, 2005, 32(1): 23-28.
  • 8CONNER M, SPARKS P, POVEY R, et al. Moder- ator Effects of Attitudinal Ambivalence on Attitude- Behaviour Relationships[J]. European Journal of So- cial Psychology, 2002, 32(5): 7054718.
  • 9KROSNICK J A, PETTY R E. Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences[M]. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 1995 : 1-24.
  • 10CONNER M, SPARKS P. Ambivalence and Atti- tudes[J]. European Review of Social Psychology, 2002, 12(1): 37-70.

二级参考文献65

  • 1Adejumo, G., Duimering, P. R., & Zhong, Z. (2008). A balance theory approach to group problem solving. Social Networks,30(1), 83-99.
  • 2Bassili, J. N. (1996). Meta-judgmental versus operative indexes of psychological attributes: The case of measures of attitude strength. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(3), 637-653.
  • 3Bearden, W. O., & Etzel, M. J. (1982). Reference group influence on product and brand purchase decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(3), 183-94.
  • 4Bohlmann, J. D., Rosa, J. A., Bolton, R. N., & Qualls, W. J. (2006). The effect of group interactions on satisfaction judgments: satisfaction escalation. Marketing Science, 25(4), 301-321.
  • 5Brown, J. J. & Reingen, P. H. (1987). Social ties and word-of-mouth referral behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(1), 350-362.
  • 6Burnham, T. A., Frels, J. K., & Mahajan, V. (2003). Consumer switching costs: A typology, antecedents, and consequences. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 31 (2), 109-126.
  • 7Cacioppo, J T., Gardner, W. L., & Berntson, G.G. (1997). Beyond bipolar conceptualizations and measures: The case of attitudes and evaluative space. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1(1), 3-25.
  • 8Cavazza, N., & Butebra, F. (2008). Bending without breaking: Examining the role of attitudinal ambivalence in resisting persuasive communication. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1-15.
  • 9Clark, J. K., Wegener, D. T., & Fabrigar, L. R, (2008). Attitudinal ambivalence and message-based persuasion: Motivated processing of proattitudinal information and avoidance of counterattitudinal information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(4), 565-577.
  • 10Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

同被引文献219

引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部