非法抑或策略——严禁引诱、欺骗取证的例外研究

Illegal or Strategic: the Study of the Permission in Collecting Evidences through Seducing and Cheating Acts

我国《刑事诉讼法》第五十条,将相比于刑讯逼供、威胁取证手段具有更小危害程度的引诱、欺骗取证绝对禁止。该规定不但在立法上存在着模糊与矛盾,在实践中亦与现实相脱节。引诱、欺骗取证在当前具有一定的法律容许性。在定位引诱、欺骗取证的性质时,为了追求"公理化理想",应当维持《刑事诉讼法》第五十条之规定,同时通过立法或者司法解释的方式规定严禁引诱、欺骗取证的例外,即限定引诱、欺骗适用的案件、对象与程度。

The article 50 of Criminal Procedure Law strictly forbid collecting evidences through seducing or cheating acts which are more temperate than torture and threat. This clause is not only obscure and contradictory in legislative texts but also detached form the legal practice. Seducing and cheating acts are permissible in some situations. In order to show the characters of seducing and cheating methods in collecting evidence,we should keep the regulation of the article 50. At the same time,we should regulate the exceptive situations of the forbidden article through legal interpretation and limit the application range of cases,objects and degrees.