论人的有限性对认识“逻各斯”的困境

On the Limitation of People's Understanding of Logos

基于赫拉克利特的残篇,尝试从认识论的角度对赫拉克利特的"逻各斯"做出一种合理性的解读。首先,从两个角度对赫拉克利特的"逻各斯"进行解读,指出人通过智性认识的是一种可被言说的属人的逻各斯,这样的"逻各斯"是基于人的认识能力的一种"有";源初性的"逻各斯"本身是不能在属人的经验界限内得以认识的,正如赫拉克利特在残篇中所描绘的这是"那智慧者"的逻各斯,是一种作为万物之所以有的"无",其自己展开自身又返回自身。那么对"逻各斯"的认识也就陷入了一种困境。接着,通过分析表明在认识论中作为认识主体的人对源初性"逻各斯"认识的思维有限性即人的有限性是产生这样的困境的根源,其最为直接的也就表现为人的可"思"却不可"言说"的尴尬困境。最后,对人的思维有限性即人的有限性这一问题以及如何才能规避这一有限性从而直面"逻各斯"本身做出尝试性思考。

This thesis attempts from the epistemological point of view of Heraclitus ＂Logos ＂to make a rational interpretation based on the fragments of Heraclitus. First, To interpret Heraclitus ＂Logos ＂from two perspectives, Pointed out that people knew the logos which belong people by intellectual understanding, and this logos is a ＂having＂ which is based on the cognitive ability of human; the original logos can＇t be known in the limitation of people＇s Experience, As Heraclitus described that this is the wisdom＇s logos in his Fragments and it is a ＂hollow＂ which is the reason for everything and Expand and returned by itself. So we caught in a dilemma about the knowing of logos. Then we indicate that people as the subject have a limitation of thinking which is also called the limitation of human to know logos in Epistemology which is the primary reason due to the production of Dilemma, it is a direct performance that we can ＂think＂ but not ＂say＂, it is an Embarrassing predicament. Finally, we make a try to think about the problem of the limitation of thinking which is also called the limitation of human and how to avoid the limitation to face logos itself.