期刊文献+

农村老年人资源生成器量表的修订与评价 被引量:6

Revision and evaluation of the rural elderly resource generator scale
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:修订农村老年人资源生成器量表,并评价其信度和效度。方法通过文献查阅、焦点小组讨论、专家咨询等方法编制“资源生成器”测量个人社会资本;在山东省三县随机抽取符合条件的975名老年人进行问卷调查;采用 Mokken 量表分析、Pearson 相关分析等方法对量表进行评价。结果通过 Mokken 量表的验证性检验,“资源生成器”形成的日常生活资源量表、专家咨询资源量表、技能资源量表及困境应对资源量表中的各条目均具有很好的可接受性及鉴别能力;各分量表与总量表之间的相关系数为0.58~0.74(P <0.01),各分量表之间的相关系数为0.22~0.34(P <0.01)。结论研究修订的农村老年人资源生成器量表具有良好的信度和效度,在今后农村老年人生活和生命质量的分析中具有重要的应用价值。 Objective To revise the rural elderly resource generator scale and evaluate its reliability and validity. Methods Prepared by literature review,focus group discussions,experts’consultation and other procedures,the Chi-nese version of “resource generator”to measure individual social capital was finally formed.A total of 975 qualified elderly people living in 3 counties of Shandong Province were interviewed through random sampling method.The Mokken scale analysis and Pearson correlation analysis were used to test the reliability and validity of the scale.Results According to the Mokken scales confirmatory test,each item of the domestic resources scale,expert advice scale, personal skills scale and problem solving resources scale generated by “resource generator”had a good acceptability and discriminability.The correlation coefficient of each subscale and total scale ranged from 0.58 to 0.74(P 〈0.01),and the correlation coefficients among subscales ranged from 0.22 to 0.34(P 〈0.01).Conclusion The revised rural eld-erly resource generator scale has good reliability and validity and will have a great application value to analyze the rural elderlys quality of life in the future.
出处 《山东大学学报(医学版)》 CAS 北大核心 2015年第2期87-91,共5页 Journal of Shandong University:Health Sciences
基金 国家自然科学基金青年基金(71103112)
关键词 社会资本 Mokken 量表 资源生成器 老年人 Social capital Mokken scale Resource generator Elderly
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献50

共引文献766

同被引文献46

  • 1陈玉平,刘雪琴,蔡德鸿.骨质疏松症健康信念量表的信度和效度测定[J].中国临床康复,2005,9(3):196-197. 被引量:48
  • 2陈玉平,刘雪琴.骨质疏松症自我效能量表的信度与效度测定[J].解放军护理杂志,2005,22(8):38-39. 被引量:50
  • 3陈玉平,刘雪琴,蔡德鸿.骨质疏松症知识问卷的信度和效度测定[J].中国骨质疏松杂志,2005,11(3):339-341. 被引量:142
  • 4全国老龄工作委员会办公室.中国人口老龄化发展趋势预测研究报告[EB/OL].[2006-02-24].http://www.xinhuanet.com/newscenter/.
  • 5Van Der Gaag M,Snijders TAB. The resource generator :social capital quantification with concrete items [J]. SocialNetworks, 2005, 27 (1) : 1-29.
  • 6Webber MP, Huxley PJ. Measuring access to social capital:the validity and reliability of the resource generator-UK andits association with common mental disorder [J]. Soc SciMed, 2007, 65 (3) : 481-492.
  • 7Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, et al. SF-36 health sur-vey manual and interpretation guide [M]. Boston: NewEngland Medical Center of the Health Institute, 1993 : 1-12.
  • 8Ware JE, Kosinski M. SF-36 physical &- mental health summa-ry scales: a manual for users of version 1 [M]. New York:Quality Metric, 2001 : 1-238.
  • 9Lam CLK, Tse EYY,Gandek B, et al. The SF-36 sum-mary scales were valid,reliable, and equivalent in a Chi-nese population [J]. J Clin Epidemiol, 2005,58 (8): 815-822.
  • 10Rueda S. Health inequalities among older adults in Spain:the importance of gender, the socioeconomic development ofthe region of residence, and social support [J]. Womenf sHealth Issues,2012, 22 (5): 483-490.

引证文献6

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部