期刊文献+

不同检索工具检索垂柳Unigene序列SSR位点的效率比较 被引量:1

Comparison of Different Search Tools to Find Microsatellite Sites in Unigene Sequences of Salix babylonica
原文传递
导出
摘要 在SSR标记开发中,合适的位点检索工具是获取位点信息、保障位点准确度及提高开发效率的关键。本研究选取了国内外文献中常用的11种基于Windows系统或在线形式的检索工具对垂柳Unigene序列进行SSR位点检索,比较了不同检索工具的参数设置、使用方式、数据录入量、运行时间、位点统计信息量及位点准确度。经综合对比,检索工具MISA位点检出率及准确度最高,结果统计信息最为丰富;检索工具SSR Locator位点检出率比MISA略低,但操作相对简单,运行时间短,且能对候选位点进行引物设计并模拟PCR反应。因此,推荐MISA和SSR Locator为微卫星位点检索的首选工具。 What kind of search tools we choose is very critical for mining microsatellite with plenty of locus information and locus accuracy as well as high developmental efficiency. In present study, eleven search tools based on Windows operation system or online running were employed to compare their parameter setting-up, operational patterns, data availability, running time, locus information and accuracy through screening the SSR loci in the unigenes of S. babylonica. With the comprehensive comparison, MISA was proved to be the most efficient due to the highest accuracy and the most informative. While SSR Locator with the advantages of easier operating and shorter running time as well as easy for primer designing and PCR simulating for candidate locus was also an ideal alternative to MISA although the detection rate was slightly lower than MISA. Therefore, MISA and SSR Locator are preferentially recommended for mining microsatellite loci in this study.
出处 《分子植物育种》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第1期197-204,共8页 Molecular Plant Breeding
基金 江苏省自然科学基金(BK2011871) 国家自然科学基金(31300556)共同资助
关键词 微卫星 微卫星位点 检索工具 柳树 Microsatellite, SSR locus, Search tool, Salix babylonica
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Castelo A.T., Martins W., and Gao G.R., 2002, Troll-Tandem re- peat occurrence locator, Bioinformatics, 18(4): 634-636.
  • 2Ellis J.R., and Burke J.M., 2007, EST-SSRs as a resource for population genetic analyses, Heredity, 99(2): 125-132.
  • 3Gupta P.K., and Varshney R.K., 2000, The development and use of microsatellite markers for genetic analysis and plant breeding with emphasis on bread wheat, Euphytica, 113(3): 163-185.
  • 4He X.D., Wang Y., Li F.G., Weng Q.J., Li M., Xu L.A., Shi J.S., and Gan S.M., 2012, Development of 198 novel EST-de- rived microsatellites in Eucalyptths (Myrtaceae), Am. J. Bot., 99(4): e134-e148.
  • 5Huang H., Lu J., Ren Z.B., Hunter W., Dowd S.E., and Dang P., 2011, Mining and validating grape (Vitis L.) ESTs to de- velop EST-SSR markers for genotyping and mapping, Mol. Breeding, 28(2): 241-254.
  • 6Kalia R.K., Rai M.K., Kalia S., Singh R., and Dhawan A.K., 2011, Microsatellite markers: an overview of the recent progress in plants, Euphytica, 177(3): 309-334.
  • 7Kashi Y., King D., and Soller M., 1997, Simple sequence repeats as a source of quantitative genetic variation, Trends Genet., 13(2): 74-78.
  • 8Lawson M.J., and Zhang L.Q., 2006, Distinct patterns of SSR distribution in the A rd4dopsis thdiana and rice genomes, BMC Genome Biol., 7(2): R14.
  • 9Levinson G., and Gutman G.A., 1987, Slipped-strand mispairing: a major mechanism for DNA sequence evolution, Mol. Bi- ol. Evol., 4(3): 203-221.
  • 10Li Y.C., Korol A.B., Fahima T., Beiles A., and Nevo E., 2002, " Microsatellites: genomic distribution, putative functions and mutational mechanisms: a review, Mol. Ecol., 11(12):2453-2465.

同被引文献14

引证文献1

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部