期刊文献+

腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术的手术室整体护理及配合 被引量:49

Laparoscopic radical resection of rectal carcinoma of holistic nursing care in operation room and coordination
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术的手术室整体护理及配合情况。方法选取我院2013年1月~2014年1月行腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术患者80例临床资料进行分析依据护理措施不同进行临床分组:干预组40例,对照组40例,对照组实施随机对症护理,干预组实施围术期整体护理,包括术前、术中及术后护理,比较两组SAS评分的变化情况、两组患者的SBP、DBP、HR的变化情况以及两组术后肛门排气时间、术后下床活动时间、引流管拔出时间、术后疼痛率情况。结果入院时两组SAS评分组间比较无明显差异(t=0.934、4.48,P〉0.05),干预后干预组的SAS评分(32.0±5.6)分,显著低于对照组的(45.3±7.0)分,组间比较差异均有统计学意义(t=6.237,P〈0.05)。干预组患者的SBP、DBP、HR干预后与入院时比较无显著变化,而对照组患者的SBP、DBP、HR干预后与入院时比较,差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。干预组患者的SBP、DBP、HR干预后与对照组比较,差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。干预组患者术后肛门排气时间、术后下床活动时间、引流管拔出时间均短于对照组,组间比较差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。且干预组患者术后疼痛率均显著低于对照组,组间比较差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论手术室护理人员将整体护理应用于腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术同时密切配合,有利于缓解患者的焦虑情绪、保持生命体征的稳定,有利于提高围术期的护理质量,促进患者术后恢复。 Objective To explore the laparoscopic radical resection of rectal carcinoma of holistic nursing care in operation room and cope with the situation. Methods In our hospital from January 2013 to January 2014, the clinical data of 80 cases with laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer were analyzed,they were divided into two groups: intervention group of 40 cases, control group of 40 cases according to different nursing measures, control group treated with implement random symptomatic care, the intervention group treated with the perioperative holistic nursing, including nursing before operation, during operation and after the operation, SAS score, SBP, DBP, HR, anal exhaust time,postoperative ambulation time, drainage tube extubation time, postoperative pain rate were compared between two groups. Results The SAS score between two groups had no significant difference(t=0.934, 4.48, P〉0.05), the SAS score of the intervention group was(32.0±5.6)scores, was significantly lower than the control group(45.3±7.0) scores,the differences between two groups were statistically significant(t=6.237, P〈0.05). The SBP, DBP, HR of intervention group had no significant change at the time of admission and compared with prognosis of stem, while the SBP, DBP,HR of control group after the intervention compared with the time of admission,the differences were statistically significant(P〈0.05). The SBP, DBP, HR in the intervention group after the intervention compared with the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P〈0.05). Anal exhaust time, postoperative ambulation time, drainage tube pulled out of time of patients in the intervention group were shorter than the control group, there were statistically significant differences between two groups(P〈0.05). And the patients in the intervention group after the pain were significantly lower than those in the control group, there were statistically significant differences between two groups(P〈0.05).Conclusion Operation room nursing personnel will be applied to the whole nursing of laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer and close coordination, can help to alleviate anxiety and maintain vital signs in patients with stable, is conducive to improve the quality of nursing care in perioperative period of patients, promote the postoperative recovery.
出处 《中国现代医生》 2015年第4期148-151,共4页 China Modern Doctor
基金 浙江省医药卫生一般研究计划(2012KYB029)
关键词 腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术 手术室 整体护理 SAS评分 Laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer Operation room Holistic nursing SAS score
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

二级参考文献61

  • 1陈云霞,陈元芝,扬春.腹腔镜下直肠癌根治术中的护理与配合[J].实用医技杂志,2008,15(4):469-470. 被引量:9
  • 2王平,刘瑶,李连,刘建.Miles手术后结肠造口的护理[J].吉林医学,2005,26(5):482-483. 被引量:9
  • 3曾辉云.直肠癌患者结肠造口的护理[J].医学信息(西安上半月),2007,20(3):459-461. 被引量:6
  • 4尹立霞.人性化护理在手术室的应用[J].医药前沿,2011,(22):45.
  • 5陈洁.腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术的手术室配合分析[J].健康必读,2012,10(8):6.
  • 6林慧珠.快速康复外科与手术室整体护理的结合及思考[J]当代护士,2009(01):33.
  • 7戴博.妇产科腹腔镜手术在麻醉前进行体位摆放的探讨[J]中华现代护理学杂志,2009(01):33.
  • 8姚树桥;孙学礼.医学心理学[M]北京:人民卫生出版社,2008147.
  • 9吴在德.外科学[M]北京:人民卫生出版社,2000576.
  • 10曹伟新;李乐之.外科护理学[M]北京:人民卫生出版社,2006266-277.

共引文献168

同被引文献252

引证文献49

二级引证文献315

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部