期刊文献+

重组质粒pcDNA3.1/SurP/Trail联合吉西他滨诱导胰腺癌细胞凋亡的实验研究 被引量:2

Experimental study of apoptosis of pancreatic cancer induced by recombinant plasmid pcDNA3. 1/ SurP/ Trail with gemcitabine
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究重组质粒pc DNA3.1/Sur P/Trail联合吉西他滨诱导胰腺癌细胞凋亡的能力。方法将人胰腺癌细胞株SW1990分为4组,第1组转染重组质粒联合吉西他滨(联合组),第2组单纯转染重组质粒(重组质粒组),第3组单纯加入吉西他滨(吉西他滨组),第4组未加任何处理(空白对照组)。通过Western blotting检测各组细胞中Trail蛋白表达的情况,并用流式细胞仪检测SW1990胰腺癌细胞凋亡率。结果 (1)重组质粒组、联合组均有Trail蛋白表达,吉西他滨组、空白对照组则无Trail蛋白表达;(2)联合组SW1990细胞凋亡率显著高于其他各组(P<0.05);重组质粒组和吉西他滨组SW1990细胞凋亡率显著高于空白对照组(P<0.05);重组质粒组与吉西他滨组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论重组质粒pc DNA3.1/Sur P/Trail与吉西他滨联可显著提高SW1990胰腺癌细胞的凋亡率。 Objective To study the synergistic effect of the recombinant plasmid pcDNA3 . 1/SurP/Trail and gemcit-abine to induce apoptosis in pancreatic cancer cells. Methods The human pancreatic cancer cell line SW1990 were di-vided into four groups, the recombinant plasmid combined gemcitabine group (combination group), the recombinant plasmid group, gemcitabine group and the control group. The expression of Trail was detected by Western blotting meth-od and analyzed the apoptosis of SW1990 cells by double labeling flow cytometry. Results (1) There was Trail protein expression in recombinant plasmid group and combination group, while no in gemctitabine group and control group;(2) The apoptosis rate of SW1990 cells in combination group was significantly higher than the other groups ( P0 . 05 ) . Conclusion Combination of recombinant plasmid pcDNA3 . 1/SurP/Trail and gemcitabine could signifi-cantly increase the rate of apoptosis of SW1990 pancreatic cancer cells.
出处 《胃肠病学和肝病学杂志》 CAS 2015年第1期72-74,共3页 Chinese Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
关键词 基因治疗 pcDNA3. 1/SurP/Trail 吉西他滨 凋亡 Gene therapy pcDNA3 . 1/SurP/Trail Gemcitabine Apoptosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献11

  • 1赵国旗,许奕,王蔷.鼻咽癌放射治疗前测定血管内皮生长因子的意义[J].中西医结合学报,2005,3(4):274-277. 被引量:12
  • 2Hai-Tao Guan,Xing-Huan Xue,Zhi-Jun Dai,Xi-Jing Wang,Ang Li,Zhao-Yin Qin.Down-regulation of survivin expression by small interfering RNA induces pancreatic cancer cell apoptosis and enhances its radiosensitivity[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2006,12(18):2901-2907. 被引量:40
  • 3Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer Statistics 2008. CA Cancer J Clin, 2008,58:71-96.
  • 4Lochan R, Daly AK, Reeves HL, et al, Genetic susceptibility in pancreatic ductal adenoearcinoma. Bri J Surg, 2008,95 : 22-32.
  • 5Hassan MM, Bondy ML, Wolff RA, et al. Risk Factors for Pancreatic Cancer: Case-Control Study. Am J Gastroenterol, 2007, 102: 2696-2707.
  • 6Katz MH, Hwang R, Fleming JB, et al. Tumor-node-metastasis staging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. CA Cancer J Clin, 2008,58:111-125.
  • 7Raut CP, Tseng JF, Sun CC, et al. Impact of resection status on pattern of failure and survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg, 2007,246 : 52- 60.
  • 8Westgaard A, Tafjord S, Farstad IN, et al, Resectable adenocarcinomas in the pancreatic head: the retroperitoneal resection margin is an independent prognostic factor. BMC Cancer, 2008,14:5.
  • 9Samra JS, Gananadha S, Hugh TJ. Surgical management of carcinoma of the head of pancreas: extended iymphadenectomy of modified en bloc resection? ANZ J Surg, 2008, 78:228-236.
  • 10Farnell MB, Aranha GV, Nimura Y, et al. The role of extended lymphadenectomy for adenocareinoma of the head ofthe pancreas: strength of the evidence. J Gastrointest Surg, 2008, 12:651-656.

共引文献45

同被引文献14

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部