期刊文献+

TLIF手术在腰椎翻修手术中的应用及疗效评价 被引量:4

Effects of TLIF technique in lumbar revision surgery
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的采用经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(TLIF)对需要翻修的腰椎术后患者进行治疗并评价其疗效。方法回顾性分析自2008-02—2012-06采用TLIF手术治疗腰椎术后需要翻修的患者26例的临床资料。结果所有患者获得随访12-42(18.2±3.2)个月;JOA评分术前为(12.05±1.50)分,术后1年为(24.35±2.53)分,ODI评分术前为(31.26±2.45)%,术后1年为(6.08±3.25)%,术前与术后1年比较差异有统计学意义(P〈0.01);根据改善率评估优良率为92.3%。椎间高度术后(11.5±1.5)mm与术前(8.0±1.8)mm比较,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);椎间高度术后1年(11.4±1.3)mm与术后比较,差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);总体融合率为100%。结论 TLIF有利于翻修手术的操作,术中、术后伴随可治愈性的并发症如硬膜撕裂、术后神经根性疼痛、术区肿胀,其近期疗效可靠。 Objective To selectively apply TLIF technique in the lumbar revision surgery and subsequently to evaluate its effects. Methods From February 2008 to June 2012, 26 cases which accept operation and appeared revision indication were re-operated with TLIF technique. The clinical results were analyzed retrospectively. Results All patients were followed up for 12-42(18.2±3.2)months. JOA score was(12.05±1.50)preoperatively and(24.35±2.53) 12 months after operation. ODI score was(31.26 ±2.45)% preoperatively and(6.08 ±3.25)% 12 months after re-operation. The two score system showed statistical significance before and 12 months after revision operation(P〈 0.01). The excellent and good rate was 92.3% which based on improvement rate calculation. The average intervertebral height changed from(8.0 ±1.8)mm preoperatively to(11.5 ±1.5)mm postoperatively, while(11.4 ±1.3)mm when followed up more than 12 month after revision-operation. It showed significant difference compared before and after revision, same as to compared it with the final follow up which was performed more than 12 months(P 〈0.05), but no significant difference compared between the two latter(P 〉0.05). The fusion rate was 100% observed on dynamic X-ray photo. Conclusion TLIF can facilitate operation procedures with dependable effect, fewer curable complications such as dural tear and cerebrospinal fluid leakage, nerve root pain and wound swelling occurred in or after the revision surgery.
出处 《中国骨与关节损伤杂志》 2015年第1期57-59,共3页 Chinese Journal of Bone and Joint Injury
基金 卫生部科技发展计划项目(W2013ZT082)
关键词 经椎间孔腰椎融合术 腰椎翻修 疗效评价 TLIF Lumbar revision surgery Curative effect evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Park JS,Choi SE,Cho TK,et al. Becorrenee rate after hemiotomy only versus dlseeetomy in lumbar disc herniation[J]. Korean J Spine, 2013,10(4):227-231.
  • 2Fanndez AA,Schwender JD,Safriel Y,et al. Clinical and radiologi- cal outcome of anterior-posterior fusion versus trandomminal lum- bar interbody fusion for symptomatic disc degenemtion:a retrospec- tive comparative study of 133 patients [J]. Eur Spine J,2009,18(2): 203-211.
  • 3郝永宏,邓树才,李建江,马毅.经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术在腰椎翻修术中的应用[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,2011,25(1):87-90. 被引量:13
  • 4Fairbank JCT, Pynaent PB. The Oswestry Disability Index [J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ,2000,25(22) :2940-2952.
  • 5Shah RR,Mohammed S,Saifuddin A,et al. Comparison of plain ra- diographs with CT scan to evaluate interbody fusion following the use of titanium interbody cages and transpedicular instrumentation [J]. Eur Spine J,2003,12(4) :378-385.
  • 6Smith JS,Ogden .AT,Shafizadeh S,et al. Clinical outcomes after mi- croendoscopic dicsectomy for recurent lumbar disc herniation [J]. Spinal Disord Tech,2010,23(1) :30-34.
  • 7Ozgur BM, Hughes SA,Baird LC, etal. Minimally disruptive decom- pression and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion [J]. Spine J, 2006,6(1) :27-33.
  • 8Salehi SA,Tawk R,Ganju A,et al. Tmndoraminal lumbar inter- bodyfusion:surgical technique and results in 24 patients [J]. Neuro- surg, 2004,54(2), 368-374.
  • 9陈建华,王盛海,杨波,李维,张亚林,旦明清.改良TLIF治疗退变性腰椎滑脱并椎管狭窄症[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2012,27(3):248-249. 被引量:28
  • 10王洪伟,孙连星,王尚忠,段洪凯,陈广辉,赵湘军.微创经多裂肌间隙单侧椎弓根钉固定TLIF术治疗椎间盘源性腰痛的疗效评价[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2013,28(9):817-819. 被引量:9

二级参考文献35

共引文献47

同被引文献26

引证文献4

二级引证文献56

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部