期刊文献+

骨转移瘤患者生存质量调查问卷QLQ-BM22简体中文版的评估及临床应用 被引量:5

Evaluation and application of the simplified Chinese version of the EORTC QLQ-BM22 questionnaire for quality of life in patients with bone metastases
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 旨在将英文版骨转移瘤患者生存质量调查问卷(EORTC QLQ-BM22)翻译为简体中文版,并评估其效用.方法 将英文版骨转移瘤患者生存质量调查问卷翻译成简体中文版,通过2位英语母语译者独立回译合并进行文化调试,发送至EORTC总部对回译版及原版进行比较.选取2012年9月至2013年3月期间收治的骨转移癌患者10例,男6例,女4例;年龄37~78岁,平均59.4岁.填写调查问卷并记录患者对问卷中内容理解存在的疑惑,评估患者对本问卷的理解程度,通过患者的反馈信息重新修改简体中文版问卷.选取2013年4月至2014年3月期间收治的骨转移瘤患者50例,男27例,女23例;年龄46~84岁,平均57.2岁.于术前、术后第3天、术后1、3和6个月随访时分别填写调查问卷;通过EORTC QLQ-BM22评分情况评估患者生存质量.结果 EORTC通过比较回译版及原版,认为翻译准确表达了原版的内容,可作为简体中文版正式发布.患者对中文版问卷的理解无困难,均能切题地完成问卷的填写.临床随访病例除社会心理评分于各随访阶段具有较大的波动性外,术后疼痛部位、疼痛程度、功能以及总分较术前均明显降低.患者术后生存质量明显提高.结论 EORTC QLQ-BM22可作为评估中国群体骨转移瘤患者生存质量的一份有效量表,亦可用于评估治疗对生存质量的改善效果. Objective To translate the EORTC QLQ-BM22 into simplified Chinese and evaluate its utility.Methods Translate,reverse translate and cultural adjustment:Authors translated the English version of EORTC QLQ-BM22 into simplified Chinese.Two individual native English-speakers translated the Chinese version back into English.The reverse translated version was sent to EORTC for reviewing.From Sept 2012 to March 2013,we enrolled 10 patients with bone metastases (mean age 59.4,37-78).There were 6 male and 4 female.Patients were asked to complete the questionnaire and questions about understanding of the questionnaire were recorded.How well patients could understand the questionnaire was evaluated and modification was made accordingly.From April 2013 to March 2014,50 patients with bone metastases were admitted in our hospital.They were asked to take the questionnaire before and three days,one month,three months and 6 months after operation.The scores were analyzed and quality of life was evaluated.Results EORTC approved the translation of the simplified Chinese version of EORTC QLQ-BM22 questionnaire due to its accuracy to reflect the original version,and the Chinese version was online.Patients found no difficulty in understanding the questionnaire,and could complete the form without too much effort.We had 27 male and 23 female who participated in our survey (mean age 57.2,46 to 84).According to the scores,scale of pain,sites of pain,and function were all significantly improved postoperatively.Patients received elevated quality of life with surgical treatment.Conclusion Simplified Chinese version of EORTC QLQ-BM22 could be used as an effective questionnaire in evaluating the quality of life for patients with bone metastases.
出处 《中华骨科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第2期142-147,共6页 Chinese Journal of Orthopaedics
基金 上海申康新兴前沿技术联合攻关项目(SHDC12013107),上海市卫计委新优青人才项目(XYQ2013108)
关键词 骨骼 肿瘤转移 问卷调查 Skeleton Neoplasm metastasis Questionnaires
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Coleman RE, Rubens RD. The clinical course of bone metastases from breast cancer[J]. Br J Cancer, 1987, 55(1): 6t-66.
  • 2Chow E, Hird A, Velikova G, et al. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Lif Question- naire for patients with t)une metastases: the EORTC QLQ- BM22 [J]. Eur J Cancer, 2009, 45(7): 1146-1152.
  • 3Tharmalingam SI, Chow E, Harris K, et al. Quality of life mea- surement in bone metastases: A literatm review [J]. J Pain Res, 2008, 1 : 49-58.
  • 4Chow E, Hoskin P, van der Linden Y, et al. Quality of life and symptom end points in palliative bone metastases trials [J]. Clin Oneol (R Cnll Radiot), 2006, 18(1): 67-69.
  • 5Yeh DC, Chen DR, Chao TY, et al. EORTC QLQ-BM22 quality of life evaluation and pain outcome in patients with bone metastases from breast c.aneer treated with zoledrnnic acid [J ]. In Vivo, 2014, 28(5): 1001-1004.
  • 6Kurosaka S, Satoh T, Chow E, et al. EORTC QLQ-BM22 and QLQ- C30 quality of life scores in patients with painful bone metastases of prostate cancer treated with strontium-89 radionuclide therapy [J]. Ann Nuel Med, 2012, 26(6): 485-491.
  • 7王国文,韩秀鑫,马育林,多健,杨吉龙,廖志超.射频消融辅助椎体次全切除术在脊柱转移瘤中的应用[J].中华骨科杂志,2011,31(9):938-943. 被引量:10
  • 8Bedard G, Zeng L, Poon M, et al. Comparison of the EORTC QLQ- BM22 and the BOMET-QOL quality of life questionnaires in pa- tients with bone metastases [J]. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol, 2014, 10 (2): 118-123.
  • 9Popovie M, Nguyen J, Chen E, et al. Comparison of the EORTC QLQ-BM22 and the FACT-BP for assessment of quality of life in eancer patients with bone metastases [J]. Expert Rev Pharmaeo-econ Outcomes Res, 2012, 12(2): 213-219.
  • 10无.骨转移瘤外科治疗专家共识[J].中华骨科杂志,2009,29(12):1177-1184. 被引量:24

二级参考文献12

  • 1Gasbarrini A, Li H, Cappuccio M, et al. Efficacy evaluation of a new treatment algorithm for spinal metastases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2010, 35(15): 1466-1470.
  • 2Hatrick NC, Lucas JD, Timothy AR, et al. The surgical treatment of metastatic disease of the spine. Radiother Oncol, 2000, 56(3): 335-339.
  • 3Young RF, Post EM, King GA. Treatment of spinal epidural metastases. Randomized prospective comparison of lamineetomy and radiotherapy. J Neurosurg, 1980, 53(6): 741-748.
  • 4Sandri A, Carbognin G, Regis D, et al. Combined radiofrequeney and kyphoplasty in painful osteolytie metastases to vertebral bodies. Radiol Med, 2010, 115(2): 261-271.
  • 5Thanos L, Mylona S, Galani P, et al. Radiofrequency ablation of osseous metastases for the palliation of pain. Skeletal Radiol, 2008, 37(3): 189-194.
  • 6Tomita K, Kawahara N, Murakami H, et al. Total en bloc spondylectomy for spinal tumors: improvement of the technique and its associated basic background. J Orthop Sci, 2006, 11(1): 3-12.
  • 7Liljenqvist U, Lerner T, Halm H, et al. En bloc spondylectomy in malignant tumors of the spine. Eur Spine J, 2008, 17 (4): 600- 609.
  • 8Tanaka M, Nakahara S, ho Y, et al. Surgical treatment of metastatic vertebral tumors. Acta Med Okayama, 2009, 63 (3): 145-150.
  • 9Demura S, Kawahara N, Murakami H, et al. Total en bloc spondylectomy for spinal metastases in thyroid carcinoma. J Neurosurg Spine, 2011, 14(2): 172-176.
  • 10Chen YJ, Hsu HC, Chen KH, et al. Transpedicular partial corpectomy without anterior vertebral reconstruction in thoracic spinal metastases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2007, 32 (22): E623- 626.

共引文献32

同被引文献47

  • 1无.骨转移瘤外科治疗专家共识[J].中华骨科杂志,2009,29(12):1177-1184. 被引量:24
  • 2王全兵,邱平.腰腿痛患者误诊病例分析[J].实用骨科杂志,2006,12(5):443-444. 被引量:2
  • 3Clment-Demange L, C16zardin P. Emerging therapies in bone metastasis [ J ]. Curr Opin Pharmaco1,2015 ,22 :79-86.
  • 4Patrick DI., Cleeland CS, yon Moos R, et al. Pain outcomes in patients with bcme metastases iom advanced cancer: assessment and management with bone-targeting agents [ J ]. Support Care Cancer,2015,23 (4) : 1157-1168.
  • 5A1-Bataineh O, Jenne J, Huber P. Clinical and future applications of high intensity focused ultrasound in cancer [ J ]. Cancer Treat Rev,2012,38(5 ) :346-353.
  • 6Jenne JW, Preusser T, Gtinther M. High-intensity focused uhrasound : principles, therapy guidance, simulations and applications [ J ]. Z Med Phys,2012,22 (4) :311-322.
  • 7Napoli A, Anzidei M, Ciolina F, et al. MR-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound: current status of an emerging technology[ J 1. Cardiovasc lntervent Radiol,2013,36(5 ) : 1190-1203.
  • 8Masciocchi C, Conchiglia A, Gregori LM, et al. Critical role of HIFU in musculoskeletal interventions [ J ]. Radiol Med,2014,119 (7) :470475.
  • 9En'ico A. Surgery: MRgFUS-non invasive treatment for patients with painful bone metastasis [ J 1- Nat Rev Clin Oncol, 2014, 11 (6) :303.
  • 10Napoli A, Anzidei M, Marincola BC, et al. MR imaging-guided focused ultrasound for treatment of bone metastasis [ J ]. Radiographies, 2013,33 ( 6 ) : 1555-1568.

引证文献5

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部