摘要
第三人欺诈问题理应适用于所有有相对人的法律行为。这里"第三人"范围要有所限制,应根据个案的具体情况,在考虑公平性和利益归属基础上加以确定。现行法律框架下,比照我国法律行为中的错误制度无法对受欺诈人提供充分救济。未来民法典应借鉴《德国民法典》所采纳的效力模式,在相对人知道或应当知道第三人欺诈事由情形下,赋予受欺诈人意思表示撤销权。
The third person fraud should be applicable to all the other partyg legal behavior. Here, the range of third person should be limited according to the actual circumstances of the case and defined on the basis of considering the fairness and the interests belonging. Under current legal framework, in contrast to error system in the juristic act in China it cannot provide sufficient relief for the cheated person. The future civil code should adopt the effectiveness model represented by the German Civil Code, under the case of the other party know or should know that a third person fraud case and endow the deceptive person right of intention cancella- tion.
出处
《西北大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第2期116-121,共6页
Journal of Northwest University:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition
基金
陕西省教育厅科学研究计划项目(HR12002)
关键词
第三人欺诈
利益冲突
效力模式
撤销权
the third person fraud
interest conflicts
effectiveness model
cancellation right