期刊文献+

全印联邦:英国实施印度宪政改革的一贯目标 被引量:2

All-India Federation:The Consistent Goal of Indian Constitutional Reforms Implemented by the UK
下载PDF
导出
摘要 19世纪60年代,英国开始在英属印度推行宪政改革,增加总督参事会中印度人成员的名额。在第一次世界大战后,英印宪政改革则与印度问题的最终解决即权力移交问题联系起来。英国的政治精英认为,将政权移交给一个统一的印度政府可以在最大限度内维护英国在印度的政治利益、经济利益和战略利益。1918年《蒙塔古-蔡姆斯福德报告》提出由英属印度和印度土邦组成全印联邦的设想,此后的宪政改革努力如《西蒙委员会报告》、圆桌会议、《1935年印度政府法》、内阁使团方案一再重申并不断完善联邦方案,以便在和平统一的基础上移交权力。 The UK begun to implement constitutional reforms in the British India in the 1860 s,increasing Indian members in the Viceroy Council.After World War I,the British government linked the constitutional reforms with the final solution of Indian Problem also called the problem of the transfer of power.British political,economic and strategic interests would be maintained to the most extent if the power be transferred to a unified Indian government.The Montagu-Chelmsford Report(1918)put forward an idea of the All-India Federation including the British India and the Indian Princely States.Thereafter,the British government made great efforts for constitutional reforms,for example,the Simon Committee Report,the Round Table Conferences,the Government of India Act in 1935,the Cabinet Mission Plan restated to perfect the federal scheme,so as to transfer the power on the basis of peaceful reunification.
作者 谌焕义
出处 《广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 北大核心 2014年第6期154-160,共7页 Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
基金 广东省教育厅资助项目"印度土邦研究"
关键词 全印联邦 宪政改革 英属印度 印度土邦 All-India Federation constitutional reform British India Indian Princely States
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1C. H. Philips. The Evolution of India and Pakistan1858 to 1947 ? Select Documents[G]. London : OxfordUniversity Press, 1962.
  • 2Reginald Coupland. The Future of India\_V[M]. Lon-don, 1945.
  • 3Sumit Sarkar. Modern India,1885 —1947[M]. NewDelhi, 2005.
  • 4Andrew Muldoon. Empire,Politics and the Creationof the 1935 India Act [M]. ASHGATE e-Book,2009.
  • 5The Simon Commission9 s Plan for India [J]. CurrentHistory, August, 1930.
  • 6Durga Das. India from Curzon to Nehru & After[M].New Delhi : Rekha Printers (P)Ltd, 1981.
  • 7Reginald Coupland. The Indian Problem 1833— 1935[M], London: Oxford University Press , 1945.
  • 8B. N. Pandey. The Indian Nationalist Movement 1885—Select Documents[G]. Hong Kong,1979.
  • 9李加洞,谌焕义.1930年代全印度联邦失败的王公因素解析[J].广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2010,46(3):104-108. 被引量:2
  • 10Clement Attlee. Purpose and Policy? SelectedSpeeches[G]. London, 1946.

二级参考文献5

  • 1B. R. Nanda. Essays in Modern Indian History [M ]. London: Oxford University Press, 1980.
  • 2Ian Copland. The Princes of India in the End--Game of Empire, 1917-- 1947[M]. London: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
  • 3S. R. Ashton. British Policy towards the Indian States, 1905- 1939 [M ] . New Delhi: Select book Service Syndicate, 1985.
  • 4R.J. Moore. The Crisis of Indian Unity, 1917--1940 [M]. London: Oxford University Press, 1974.
  • 5Maharaj-kuamr Raghubir Sinh. Indian States and The New Regime[M].Bombay: D.B. Taraporevala, Sons & Co. , 1938.

共引文献1

同被引文献8

  • 1林承节.英国东印度公司怎样从商人组织转变为国家政权[J].南亚研究,1988(1):31-41. 被引量:7
  • 2谌焕义.论艾德礼政府的印度土邦政策[J].广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2006,42(4):118-124. 被引量:2
  • 3C.A.Balay. The New Cambridge History of India, III· 6: Indian Society and the Making of British Empire[M]. London: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
  • 4Barbara D. Metcalf and thomas R. Metcalf. A Concise History of India[M]. Shanghai= Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press, 2006.
  • 5Dirk H.A. Kolf. Nankar Rajput and Sepoy= The Ethnohistory of the Millitary Labour Market in Hindustan(1450--1850) [M]. London, 1990.
  • 6Richard B. Barnett. North India Between Empires: Awdh, the Mughals and the British (1720--1801)[M]. BerkeleyCA, 1980.
  • 7恩克·辛哈·阿克·班纳吉.印度通史:第三册[M].张若达,冯金辛,等译.北京:商务印书馆,1973.
  • 8李加洞,谌焕义.论二战前印度国大党土邦政策的演变[J].广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2012,48(1):138-142. 被引量:2

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部