期刊文献+

知识型员工资质过高感知对其知识分享行为和情感承诺的影响机制 被引量:16

The Influencing Mechanism of Knowledge Sharing Behavior and Affective Commitment of Knowledge Workers with Perceived Overqualification
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过对330名知识型员工进行问卷调查,探讨了知识型员工资质过高感知与知识分享行为和情感承诺的关系,并检验了组织支持感在其影响过程中的调节效应。结果表明:1资质过高感知能够显著正向预测知识型员工的知识分享行为,显著负向预测知识型员工的情感承诺;2组织支持感在知识型员工资质过高感知和知识分享行为之间具有调节作用,在资质过高感知和情感承诺之间的调节作用不显著。 Based on the 330 knowledge workers,this paper explores the relationship among perceived overqualification,sharing knowledge behavior and emotional commitment among knowledge workers,and then checks the moderation of perceived organizational support. The results show that: perceived overqualification can significantly positively predict employee's knowledge sharing behavior,and significantly negatively predict affective commitment; perceived organizational support has moderating effect between perceived overqualification and knowledge sharing behavior,but the moderating effect of perceived organizational support between perceived overqualification and affective commitment is not significant.
出处 《软科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第3期88-92,共5页 Soft Science
基金 国家社会科学基金项目(13CGL068) 河南省高校科技创新人才(人文社科类)支持计划[教社科〔2014〕295号]
关键词 资质过高感知 知识分享行为 情感承诺 知识型员工 perceived overqualification knowledge sharing behavior affective commitment knowledge worker
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献151

  • 1凌文辁,陈龙,王登.CPM领导行为评价量表的建构[J].心理学报,1987,19(2):199-207. 被引量:116
  • 2温忠麟,张雷,侯杰泰,刘红云.中介效应检验程序及其应用[J].心理学报,2004,36(5):614-620. 被引量:7788
  • 3卞冉,车宏生,阳辉.项目组合在结构方程模型中的应用[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(3):567-576. 被引量:117
  • 4侯杰泰 成子娟 马殊赫伯特.验证性因素分析问卷题数及小样本应用策略[J].心理学报,1999,:76-83.
  • 5侯杰泰,温忠麟,成子娟.(2004).结构方程摸型及其应用.北京:教育科学出版社.
  • 6Afifi, T. D., & Olson, L. (2005). The chilling effect in families and the pressure to conceal secrets. Communication Monographs, 72, 192-216.
  • 7Alhija, F. N. A., & Wisenbaker, J. (2006). A Monte Carlostudy investigating the impact of item parceling strategies on parameter estimates and their standard errors in CFA. Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 204-228.
  • 8Bandalos, D. L. (2002). The effects of item parceling on goodness-of-fit and parameter estimate bias in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 78-102.
  • 9Bandalos, D. L. (2008). Is parceling really necessary? A comparison of results from item parceling and categorical variable methodology. Structural Equation Modeling, 15, 211-240.
  • 10Bandalos, D. L., & Finney, S. J. (2001). Item parceling issues in structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling (pp. 269-296). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

共引文献4218

同被引文献190

引证文献16

二级引证文献83

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部