期刊文献+

医院知识团队绩效结构研究 被引量:1

Research on the performance structure of hospital knowledge team
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:建立医院知识团队绩效结构模型。方法在理论研究基础上提出假设模型,编制量表进行问卷调查,采用统计分析方法验证模型的拟合程度。结果医院知识团队绩效结构由患者服务、质量管理、医疗质量、工作效率、团队成长、成员感受6个维度构成,对总方差的解释率为76.92%。结论医院知识团队的绩效具有其特殊性,其绩效结构区别于现有研究结果。 Objective To establish the performance structure model of hospital knowledge team. Methods Proposing the hypothesized model on the basis of theoretical research,adopting a self-designed scale to carry out questionnaire investigation,using the method of statistical analysis to validate the fitting degree of the model.Results The performance structure of hospital knowledge team is composed of six dimensions,including patient service,quality management,medical quality,work efficiency,team growth,and team members feeling.The six dimensions can explain 76.92% of the variance.Conclusion With its special of hospital knowledge team performance,the performance structure is different from the existing research results.
出处 《中华医院管理杂志》 北大核心 2015年第3期207-210,共4页 Chinese Journal of Hospital Administration
关键词 医院知识团队 团队绩效结构 六维结构 Hospital knowledge team Team performance structure Six dimensional structure
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Kata D,Kahn RL. The social psychology of organazation[M].2nd ed. New York; John Wiley Publishers, 1978.
  • 2Borman WC, Motowidlo SJ. Expanding the criterion domainto include elements of contextual performance [M]//SchmittN, Borman WC. Personnel Selection in Organizations. San-Francisco :Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1993 :71-98.
  • 3孙健敏,焦长泉.对管理者工作绩效结构的探索性研究[J].人类工效学,2002,8(3):1-10. 被引量:98
  • 4Campbell JP, Mchenry JJ, Wise LL. Modeling job perform-ance on population of jobs[J]. Personnel Psychology,1990,43(2):313-333.
  • 5Hu L? Bender PM. Fit indices in covariance structure model-ing:sensitivity to under parameterized model misspecification[J]. Psychological Methods, 1998,3:424*453.
  • 6温忠麟,侯杰泰,马什赫伯特.结构方程模型检验:拟合指数与卡方准则[J].心理学报,2004,36(2):186-194. 被引量:1290
  • 7Guzzo RA, Dickson MW. Teams in organizations:recent re-search on performance and effectiveness[J]. Annual Review ofPsychology, 1996,47: 319-338.

二级参考文献47

  • 1[1]Tucker L R, Lewis C. The reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1973, 38: 1~10
  • 2[2]Steiger J H, Lind J M. Statistically-based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the Psychometrika Society Meeting, IowaCity, May, 1980
  • 3[3]Bentler P M, Bonett D G. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 1980, 88: 588~ 606
  • 4[4]Bentler P M. Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin,1990, 107: 238~ 246
  • 5[5]McDonald R P, Marsh H W. Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness-of-fit. Psychological Bulletin, 1990,107: 247~ 255
  • 6[6]Marsh H W, Balla J R, Hau K T. An evaluation of incremental fit indices: A clarification of mathematical and empirical processes. In: Marcoulides G A, Schumacker R E eds. Advanced structural equation modeling techniques. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1996. 315~ 353
  • 7[7]Browne M W, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen K A, Long J S eds. Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1993. 136~ 162
  • 8[8]Joreskog K G, Srbom D. LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago: Scientific Software International, 1993
  • 9[9]Hu L, Bentler P M. Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 1998, 3: 424~ 453
  • 10[10]Hu L, Bentler P M. Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 1999, 6: 1~ 55

共引文献1384

同被引文献6

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部