期刊文献+

腹腔镜手术治疗老年结直肠癌患者的安全性 被引量:54

Safety of laparoscopic treatment of colorectal cancer for elderly patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评价腹腔镜手术治疗老年结直肠癌患者的安全性。方法:回顾性分析我院年2003年6月至2013年6月收治的903例行腹腔镜与开腹手术的老年结直肠癌患者的临床资料,比较两组的手术学指标、术后恢复及肿瘤学指标。结果:两组患者的临床病理资料及常见慢性合并症构成比较,差异无统计学意义。腹腔镜组与开腹组比较,患者手术时间[(268.3±105)min vs.(201.5±81.0)min]、术中出血量[(130.8±142.2)m L vs.(232.5±292.4)m L]、术后肠功能恢复时间为[(3.2±1.6)d vs.(3.8±1.4)d]、进食流质时间(4.4±1.6)d vs.(4.9±1.5)d]、术后住院时间[(13.4±6.8)d vs.(15.4±8.5)d]、术中主要并发症发生率[2.0%vs.3.4%]、术后主要并发症发生率[18.0%vs.25.2%]比较,差异均具有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。肺部感染、切口愈合不良和心血管意外发生率腹腔镜组显著低于开腹组(P<0.05)。在切除标本长度、清扫淋巴结数量方面两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),所有标本切缘病理学检查均为阴性。结论:只要做好充分的术前准备,掌握好手术时机,在熟练掌握腹腔镜结直肠癌手术技术的基础上,对老年结直肠癌患者实施腹腔镜手术是安全可行的。 Objective To evaluate the safety of laparoscopic treatment of colorectal cancer for elderly patients. Methods A retrospective design was used in the present study. From June 2003 to June 2013, a comparison was performed among 903 (1 805) elderly patients with colorectal cancer undergoing laparoscopic or open surgery for their clinical data, postoperative recovery indicators and oncologic outcomes. Results The clinicopathological results and chronic comorbidities had no significant difference between laparoscopie surgery group and open surgery group. There were significant differences between the two groups in terms of operative time [(268.3 ± 105) min vs. (201.5 ± 81.0) mini, blood loss [(130.8 ± 142.2) mL vs. (232.5 ± 292.4) mL], time to recovery of bowel function [(3.2± 1.6) d vs. (3.8± 1.4) d], time to liquid time [(4.4 ± 1.6) d vs. (4.9 ± 1.5) d], postoperative hospital stay [(13.4 ± 6.8) d vs. (15.4 ± 8.5) d], intraoperative complication rate (2.0% vs. 3.6%), and main postoperative complication rate (18.0% vs. 25.2%). The rates of lung infections, poor wound healing and cardiovascular accident in laparoscopic group were significantly lower than those in open surgery group (P 〈 0.05). The length of resected specimen and number of lymph nodes were not significantly different between the two groups and all specimens' margins were not involved. Conclusion Laparoscopic surgery for elderly patients with colorectal cancer seems to be safe and feasible provided that preoperative preparation and surgical indications were fully considered.
出处 《实用医学杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2015年第4期556-558,共3页 The Journal of Practical Medicine
基金 2013年广州市卫生局一般引导项目(编号:20131A011040)
关键词 结直肠肿瘤 腹腔镜 安全性 老年人 Colorectal cancer Laparoscopy Safety Elderly
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Tan KY, Kawamura Y, Mizokami K, et al. Colorectal surgery in octogenarian patients-outcomes and predictors ofmorbidity [J]. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2009,24(2):185-189.
  • 2Mormon K, Litvak DA, Bold RJ. Surgery in the aged population:surocal onenlogy [J]. Arch Stag,2003,138(10): 1061-1067.
  • 3Galizia G, Prizio G, Lieto E, et al. Hemedynamic and pulmonary changes during open, carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum and abdominal wall.lifting eholecystectomy. A prospective randomized Study [ J ]. Surg Endosc, 200l, 15 (5) :477-483.
  • 4Person B, Cera SM, Sands DR, et al. Do elderly patients benefit from laparoscopic colorectal surgery? [J]. Surg En- dose, 2008,22 ( 2 ) : 401-405.
  • 5Gunka I, Dostalik J, Martinek L,et al.Advanced age- indication or contraindication for laparoscopic colorectal surgery? [J]. Rozhl Chir,2010,89(10): 628-633.
  • 6郑民华.腹腔镜结直肠癌手术的原则与评价[J].中华外科杂志,2005,43(17):1105-1108. 被引量:74
  • 7Fmsson M, Braga M, vignali A, et al. Benefits of laparoscopic colorectal resection are more pronounced in elderly patients [J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2008,51 (3) : 296-300.
  • 8张剑明,邓海军,王亚楠,赵丽瑛,李国新.腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术后并发症危险因素的回顾性队列研究[J].实用医学杂志,2013,29(14):2359-2361. 被引量:39
  • 9Person B, Cera SM, SandsDR, et al. Do elderly patients benefit from laparoscopic colorectal surgery? [J]. Surg Endosc, 2008,22 ( 2 ) : 401-405.
  • 10Cheung HY, Chung CC, Fung JT, et al. Laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer in octogenarians: results in a decade [J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2007,50( 11 ) : 1905-1910.

二级参考文献11

共引文献111

同被引文献429

引证文献54

二级引证文献335

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部