期刊文献+

上海城市林荫道游憩适宜度评价与优化对策 被引量:6

Recreation Suitability Evaluation and Optimization Strategies of Urban Green Streets in Shanghai
下载PDF
导出
摘要 研究通过运用层次分析法,从城市林荫道道路空间适宜度、景观风貌适宜度、行道树特征适宜度、历史文化价值、游憩设施完善度和环境舒适度6个方面筛选评价指标,构建上海城市林荫道游憩适宜度评价指标体系,并选择10条上海典型的城市林荫道通过该评价体系进行游憩适宜度评价。结果表明,影响林荫道游憩适宜度的主要因素是道路空间适宜度,其次是景观风貌适宜度、行道树特征适宜度、环境舒适度,历史文化价值和游憩设施完善度对游憩适宜度的影响较小。衡山路和复兴中路综合评价得分最高(87.377、83.867),襄阳南路和乌鲁木齐南路综合评价得分最低(62.908、67.797)。通过评价结果,找出影响上海城市林荫道游憩适宜度的主要因素,并针对性地提出优化对策,为林荫道的建设提供理论依据和技术支撑。 The recreation suitability evaluation system of Shanghai green streets was established by AHP including 6evaluating indexes which are road space suitability,landscape suitability,street trees characteristic suitability,historical and cultural value,recreation facility completeness,and environment comfort degree.And10 typical green streets in Shanghai were chosen to evaluate the system.The results showed that the more important factors impacting recreation suitability are road space suitability,followed by landscape suitability,street trees characteristic suitability,and environment comfort degree.Historical and cultural value and recreational facility completeness have less effects on it.Hengshan Road and Fuxing Road comprehensively reached the highest scores(87.377,83.867),and South Xiangyang Road and south Urumqi Road comprehensively reached the lowest scores(62.908,67.797).The main factors of recreation suitability of Shanghai urban green streets were identified and the optimization methods were created in this article which can provide a theoretical basis and technical support for establishing green streets.
出处 《上海交通大学学报(农业科学版)》 2015年第1期32-40,共9页 Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University(Agricultural Science)
基金 上海市科学委员会科研计划项目(11231201002) "十二五"国家科技支撑计划项目(2012BAC13B04-05)
关键词 城市林荫道 游憩适宜度 评价体系 优化对策 urban green streets recreation suitability evaluation system optimization countermeasures
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Smith D S, Hellmund P C . Ecology of Greenways : De- sign and Function of Linear (nservation Areas [ M].Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1993.
  • 2Xiang C A, Young W N, Whitley J. Planning for multi-purpose greenways in Concord, North Carolina [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2004, 68: 271-287.
  • 3Cook E A. Landscape structure indices for assessing urban ecological networks [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2002,58 : 269 -280.
  • 4McPherson E G, Simpson J R, Xiao Qing fu, et al. Million trees Los Angeles canopy cover and benefit assessment [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2011, 99:40 -50.
  • 5Simpson J R, Mc Pherson E G. Simulation of tree shade impacts on residential energy use for space con- ditioning in Sacramento [J]. Atmospheric Environ- ment, 1998,32 : 69-74.
  • 6Benson J, Ziehn T, Dixon N S, et al. Global sensitivity analysis of a 3D street canyon model - Part Ⅱ: Ap plication and physical insight using sensitivity analysis [J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2008,42 :1874- 1891.
  • 7邵青.北京城区行道树现况调查分析和建议[J].北京园林,2008,24(2):26-33. 被引量:21
  • 8鲍淳松,楼建华,曾新宇,项志松.杭州城市园林绿化对小气候的影响[J].浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版),2001,27(4):415-418. 被引量:48
  • 9杨士弘.城市绿化树木的降温增湿效应研究[J].地理研究,1994,13(4):74-80. 被引量:104
  • 10王云,崔鹏,江玉林,陈学平.道路景观美学研究初探[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(2):206-208. 被引量:27

二级参考文献65

共引文献327

同被引文献57

引证文献6

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部