期刊文献+

基于RDEU模型在贝叶斯决策分析中引人概率权重函数的研究:以Prelec概率权重函数为例

Study on Introducing Probability Weight Function into Bayesian Decision Analysis Based on RDEU:A case study of prelec probability weight function
原文传递
导出
摘要 对有后验概率分布的决策问题进行贝叶斯分析,决策个体对概率的估计偏差未在考虑之内,导致不同决策者的分析结果并无差异,针对该问题,基于等级依赖期望效用模型中概率权重函数影响决策的机制,在贝叶斯分析中引入概率权重函数,体现决策个体对概率的不同估计,能很好克服贝叶斯决策分析的不足.以Prelec概率权重函数为例的分析表明概率权重函数的引入合理有效,可提升决策分析的针对性. For decision with posterior distribution, if we use Bayesian decision analysis, the deviation of probability is out of consideration, it leads that different individuals' analysis results are the same unreasonably. Based on RDEU's mechanism of probability weight function influences decision, we introduce probability weight function into Bayesian decision analysis. It can reflect the deviation of probability to overcome the shortage of normative Bayesian decision analysis. A case study of Prelec probability weight function shows the introducing is effective and can improve the pertinence of decision analysis.
出处 《数学的实践与认识》 北大核心 2015年第3期148-153,共6页 Mathematics in Practice and Theory
基金 武器装备军内科研基金项目"效用理论在战场目标分配中应用研究"(JNKY2012015) 陆军军官学院科研基金项目"效用理论在战场目标分配中应用研究"(YNKY2012015)
关键词 贝叶斯决策 概率权重函数 等级依赖期望效用模型 Prelec概率权重函数 bayesian decision analysis probability weight function the rank-dependentexpected utility model prelec probability weight function
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Allais M. Le comportement de thomme rationnel devant le risque: critique des postulats et axioms de I'Eclo Americaine [J]. Econometrica, 1953, 21(4): 503-546.
  • 2von Neumann J, Morgenstern O. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior [M]. New Jersey: Prince- ton University Press, 1944.
  • 3施海燕,施放.期望效用理论与前景理论之比较[J].统计与决策,2007,23(11):22-24. 被引量:18
  • 4Quiggin J. A Theory of Anticipated Utility [J]. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1982, 3(4): 323-343.
  • 5Tversky A, Kahneman D. Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty [J]. Journal of Risk Uncertainty, 1992, 5(4): 297-323.
  • 6Machina M. J. Review of "Generalized Expected Utility Theory: The Rank-Dependent Model" [J]. Journal of Economic Literature, 1994, 32(3): 1237-1238.
  • 7Starmer C. Developments in Non-Expected Utility Theory: The Hunt for a Descriptive Theory of Choice under Risk [J]. Journal of Economic Theory, 2000, 38(2):332-382.
  • 8郑振龙,何凯浩.基于信息修正的非期望效用模型[J].当代财经,2008(4):42-51. 被引量:6
  • 9苏淳.概率论(第二版)[M].北京,科学出版社,2010,101-106.
  • 10Berger J O. Statistical decision theory and Bayesian analysis (2nd Ed.) [M]. New York: Springer- Verlag, 1985.

二级参考文献28

  • 1Humphrey S. Regret Aversion or Event-Splitting Effects? More Evidence under Risk and Uncertainty [J]. Journal of Risk Uncertainty, 1995, (11): 263-274.
  • 2Shlomo Benartzi, Thaler H. Myopic Loss Aversion and the Equity Premium Puzzle[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economic, 1995, 110: 73-92.
  • 3Chris Starmer. Developments in Non-Expected Utility Theory: The Hunt for a Descriptive Theory of Choice under Risk[J]. Journal of Economic Theory, 2000, 38: 332-382.
  • 4Savage J. The foundations of Statistics[M]. New York: Wiley, 1954.
  • 5Lichtenstein S, Slovic P. Reversals of Preference between Bids and Choices in Gambling Decisions[J]. Experimental Psychology, 1971, 89: 46-55.
  • 6Slovic P. The Construction of Preferences[J]. America Psychologist, 1995, 50: 364-371.
  • 7Loomes G, Sugden R. A Rationale for Preference Reversal[J]. America Economic Review, 1983, 73: 428-432.
  • 8Tversky A, Kahneman D. The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice[J]. Science, 1981, 211: 453-458.
  • 9Tversky A, Kahneman D. Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions[J]. Journal of Business, 1986, 59(4): 251-278.
  • 10Machina J. "Expected Utility" Theory without the Independence Axiom[J]. Econometrica, 1982, 50: 277-323.

共引文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部