期刊文献+

心脏再同步化治疗术后脉冲发生器电池提前耗竭原因分析 被引量:1

Analysis of possible reasons of premature battery depletion in patients implanted with cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator device
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析心脏再同步化-心脏复律除颤器(CRT-D)脉冲发生器电池提前耗竭的可能原因。方法回顾2005年1月至2009年12月于我院行CRT-D治疗的33例患者的临床及起搏器程控资料,并对5例(15.2%)出现脉冲发生器电池提前耗竭的患者资料进行分析。结果 5例患者均为男性,平均年龄55岁,所使用的起搏器型号分别为Medtronic InsyncⅢMarquis 7279(1例),InsyncⅢMarquis protect 7285(2例)和St Jude Epic+HF-V350(2例);使用年限分别为33、44、35、41和47个月;起搏模式分别为VVI、DDD、DDD、DDD和DDD;心室起搏比例分别为99%、99%、93%、86%和96%;左心室输出电压(脉宽)分别为4.0 V(0.4 ms)、3.5 V(0.6 ms)、3.5 V(0.4 ms)、5.0 V(0.4 ms)和5.0 V(0.7 ms)。5例患者的电击治疗次数分别为4、16、33、6和0次。结论 CRT-D脉冲发生器电池提前耗竭并不少见。因脉冲发生器寿命受多种因素的影响,故导致其电池提前耗竭的原因也多样。CRT-D术后定期随访,在保证安全的前提下,尽可能减少输出电压,降低心率,减少放电治疗,以延长脉冲发生器的使用寿命。 Objective To analyze the possible reasons of premature battery depletion in patients implanted with cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator ( CRT-D) device. Methods All patients with CRT-D device implanted between 2005 and 2009 at the People's Liberation Army General Hospital were followed up. All patients with premature battery depletion were studied further. Results Five cases (15. 2%, mean age 55 years) with premature battery depletion were identified among 33 patients implanted with CRT-D device. The longevity of 5 premature depletion devices were as follows:33, 44, 35, 41 and 47 months (median 40 months). The pacing mode were VVI, DDD, DDD, DDD and DDD, and percentage of ventricular pacing were 99%, 99%, 93%, 86% and 96%. The output of left ventricular lead were 4. 0 V (0. 4 ms), 3. 5 V(0. 6 ms), 3. 5 V (0. 4 ms), 5. 0 V (0. 4 ms) and 5. 0 V (0. 7 ms). Among the above patients, two suffered from frequent inappropriate shocks. Conclusions The incidence of premature battery depletion is 15. 2% in patients implanted with CRT-D device in our center. No common mechanism has been identified for this failure. Close monitoring of battery voltage and individual parameter alteration are required in patients with these devices.
出处 《中国心血管杂志》 2015年第1期42-45,共4页 Chinese Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine
关键词 心脏再同步化治疗 心脏起搏器 人工 除颤器 植入型 电池提前耗竭 Cardiac resynchronization therapy Pacemaker,artificial Defibrillators,implantable Premature battery depletion
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Hauser RG, Hayes DL, Epstein AE, et al. Multicenterexperience with failed and recalled implantable cardioverter-defibrillator pulse generators [ J]. Heart Rhythm, 2006,3 : 640-644.
  • 2Reynolds MR,Cohen DJ, Kugelmass AD, et al. The frequencyand incremental cost of major complications among Medicarebeneficiaries receiving implantable cardioverter-defibrillators[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2006, 47: 2493-2497.
  • 3Steven D, Roberts-Thomson KC, Inada K, et al. Long-termfollow-up in patients with presumptive Brugada syndrome treatedwith implanted defibrillators [ J]. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol,2011,22: 1115-1159.
  • 4Schaer BA, Koller MT, Sticherling C, et al. Longevity ofimplantable cardioverter-defibrillators, influencing factors, andcomparison to industry-projected longevity [J], Heart Rhythm,2009, 6; 1737-1743.
  • 5Biffi M,Ziacchi M, Bertini M, et al. Longevity of implantablecardioverter-defibrillators : implications for clinical practice andhealth care systems [J]. Europace, 2008 , 10: 1288-1295.
  • 6Forleo GB, Mantica M, Di Biase L, et al. Clinical andprocedural outcome of patients implanted with a quadripolar leftventricular lead ; early results of a prospective multicenter study[J]. Heart Rhythm, 2012, 9:1822-1828.

同被引文献14

  • 1Erdogan O, Hunuk B. Right ventricular outflow tract pacing: an alternative, safe, and effective pacing site. J Long Term Eff Med Implants, 2010,20: 13-2l.
  • 2Frias PA, Corvera JS, Schmarkey L, et al. Evaluation of my- ocardial performance with conventional single-site ventricular pacing and biventricular pacing in a canine model of atrioventric- ular block. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, 2003,14 : 996-1000.
  • 3Lewicka-Nowak E, Dabrowska-Kugacka A, Tybura S, et al. Right ventricular apex versus right ventricular outflow tract pac-ing : prospective, randomised, long-term clinical and echocar- diographic evaluation. Kardiol Pol, 2006,64 : 1082 - 1091,1092 - 1083.
  • 4Ronn F, Kesek M, Karp K, et al. Right ventrieular lead posi- tioning does not influence the benefits of cardiac resynchroniza- tion therapy in patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation. Europaee, 2011,13 : 1747-1752.
  • 5Skadsberg ND, Kaiser DR, Fischer TM, et al. Global eleetro- physiological and hemodynamie assessment of ventrieular pacing employing non-contact mapping. J Interv Card Eleetrophysiol, 2009,26: 185-194.
  • 6Stambler BS, Ellenbogen K, Zhang X, et al. Right ventricular outflow ve1"sus apical pacing in pacemaker patients with conges- tive heart failure and atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electmphysi- ol,2003, 14: 1180-1186.
  • 7Su Y, Pan W, Sun A, et al. Is the optimal atrioventricular delay paced from right ventricular outflow tract different from that from fight ventricular apex? Int J Cardiol,2010, 140:245- 246.
  • 8Tse HF, Yu C, Wong KK, et al. Functional abnormalities in patients with permanent right ventricular pacing: the effect of sites of electrical stimulation. J Am Coil Cardiol,2002,40: 1451 - 1458.
  • 9Wang F, Shi H, Sun Y, et al. Right ventricular outflow pacing induces less regional wall motion abnormalities in the left ventricle compared with apical pacing. Europaee,2012,14:351- 357.
  • 10Yoon HJ, Jin SW, Her SH, et al. Acute ehanges in cardiac synehrony and output according to RV pacing sites in Koreans with normal cardiac function. Eehocardiography,2009,26:fi65- 674.

引证文献1

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部