期刊文献+

儿童急性扁桃体炎咽拭子前护理准备研究 被引量:2

Research of Nursing Preparation Before Throat Swabs in Children with Acute Tonsillitis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究儿童急性扁桃体炎咽拭子前的有效护理措施。方法选取我院26 100例行咽拭子的急性扁桃体炎患儿为研究对象,根据检测类型将其分为MP咽拭子组14 276例和EB咽拭子组11 824例。MP咽拭子组采取针对性护理措施,EB咽拭子组采取常规护理。比较两组的阳性检出率、感染发生率和患儿依从性的差异。结果 MP咽拭子组阳性率为40.63%(5 800/14 276),EB咽拭子组阳性率为41.02%(4 850/11 824),两组阳性检出率比较无统计学差异(P>0.05);MP咽拭子组感染率为0.36%(52/14 276),EB咽拭子组感染率为1.18%(140/11 824),两组感染率对比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);MP咽拭子组依从性的优良率为94.86%,显著高于EB咽拭子组的84.29%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论做好儿童急性扁桃体炎咽拭子前护理可降低患儿感染几率,提高其检测依从性,保证检测结果安全可靠。 Objective To study effective nursing measures before throat swabs in children with acute tonsillitis. Methods 26 100 cases of children with acute tonsillitis implemented throat swabs were selected and divided into MP throat swabs group(14 276 cases) and EB throat swabs group(11 824 cases) according to detection type. The MP group was given pertinent nursing measures, the EB group was given routine nursing. The positive detection rate, incidence of infection and compliance were compared. Results The positive rate of MP group was 40.63%(5 800/14 276), the positive rate of EB group was 41.02%(4 850/11 824), the difference of positive rate between two groups was not significant(P 0.05); the infection rate of MP group was 0.36%(52/14 276), significantly lower than 1.18%(140/11 824) of EB group, with statistical difference(P 0.05); the excellent and good rate of compliance of MP group was 94.86%, significantly higher than84.29% of EB group, the difference was statistically significant(P 0.05). Conclusions Nursing before throat swabs in children with acute tonsillitis can reduce the risk of infection in children, improve the detection compliance and ensure safe and reliable detection results.
机构地区 深圳市儿童医院
出处 《临床医学工程》 2015年第2期201-202,共2页 Clinical Medicine & Engineering
关键词 儿童急性扁桃体炎 咽拭子 护理 Children with acute tonsillitis Throat swab Nursing
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献46

  • 1赵喜元,赵振营,林佩妆,黎旭荣,肖薇.某小学健康学龄儿童327例咽拭子菌群调查[J].中国误诊学杂志,2005,5(2):378-379. 被引量:3
  • 2杨智宏,朱启镕,李秀珠,王晓红,王建设,胡家瑜,唐伟,崔爱利.2002年上海儿童手足口病病例中肠道病毒71型和柯萨奇病毒A组16型的调查[J].中华儿科杂志,2005,43(9):648-652. 被引量:636
  • 3赵国荣,卓志强,施燕禧.小儿肺炎支原体肺炎的诊断与治疗[J].中国人兽共患病学报,2006,22(1):96-96. 被引量:11
  • 4吴瑞萍,胡亚美,江载芳,等.实用儿科学.7版,北京:人民卫生出版社,2002.819-827.
  • 5Agoritsas K, Mack K, Bonsu BK, et al. Evaluation of the Quidel QuickVue test for detection of influenza A and B viruses in the pediatric emergency medicine setting by use of three specimen collection methods. J Clin Microbiol, 2006, 44 : 2638-2641.
  • 6Covalciuc KA, Webb KH, Carlson CA. Comparison of four clinical specimen types for detection of influenza A and B viruses by optical immunoassay (FLU OIA test) and cell culture methods. J Clin Microbiol, 1999,37:3971-3974.
  • 7Landry ML, Cohen S, Ferguson D. Impact of sample type on rapid detection of influenza virus A by cytospin-enhanced immunofluorescence and membrane enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. J Clin Microbiol, 2000,38 :429-430.
  • 8Dwyer DE, Smith DW, Catton MG, et al. Laboratory diagnosis of human seasonal and pandemic influenza virus infection. Med J Aust, 2006,185 : S48-S53.
  • 9CDC protocol of realtime RTPCR for influenza A(H1NI) [EB/OL]. (2009 04-30)[2010-10-08]. http://www. who. int/csr/resources/publications/swineflu/CDCRealtimeRTPCR _SwineH1 Assay-2009_20090430. pdf.
  • 10Ginocchio CC, Zhang F, Manji R, et al. Evaluation of multiple test methods for the detection of the novel 2009 influenza A (H1N1)during the New York City outbreak. J Clin Virol, 2009,45:191-195.

共引文献54

同被引文献10

引证文献2

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部