期刊文献+

Microflex^(TM) MALDI-TOF MS和Vitek 2 Compact全自动微生物分析系统对肠杆菌科细菌鉴定能力的比较 被引量:14

Comparison on the identification abilities of Microflex^(TM) MALDI-TOF MS and Vitek 2 Compact automatic microbial analysis system for Enterobacteriaceae
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较MicroflexTM基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-TOF MS)和Vitek 2 Compact全自动微生物分析系统(简称Vitek 2 Compact)对肠杆菌科细菌的鉴定能力。方法采用MicroflexTMMALDI-TOF MS和Vitek 2 Compact同时对545株肠杆菌科质控菌株和临床分离菌株进行鉴定,鉴定结果不一致者采用沙门菌血清凝集试验或细菌16S r DNA基因测序予以确证。结果 MicroflexTMMALDI-TOF MS对545株细菌的种和属的鉴定率分别为97.1%、2.9%。Vitek 2 Compact对545株细菌的种、群、属的鉴定率分别为83.3%、13.9%和2.2%,鉴定错误率为0.2%,未鉴定率为0.4%。结论 MicroflexTMMALDI-TOF MS对肠杆菌科细菌的鉴定符合率高于Vitek 2 Compact,且操作快速、简便,成本低,可用于临床肠杆菌科细菌的常规快速鉴定。 Objective To compare the identification abilities of Microflex^TM matrix-assisted laser desorption /ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry( MALDI-TOF MS) and Vitek 2 Compact automatic microbial analysis system( Vitek 2 Compact) for Enterobacteriaceae. Methods A total of 545 isolates of Enterobacteriaceae from a variety of clinical and quality control isolates were identified by MicroflexTMMALDI-TOF MS and Vitek 2 Compact. The isolates were confirmed by 16 S r DNA gene sequencing,and Salmonella was identified by serum agglutination test,if the identification results of the 2 systems didn't match. Results The coincidence rates of 545 isolates of Enterobacteriaceae identified by Microflex^TM MALDI-TOF MS were 97. 1% to the species level and 2. 9% to the genus level,respectively.The coincidence rates of 545 isolates of Enterobacteriaceae identified by Vitek 2 Compact were 83. 3%,13. 9% and2. 2% to the species,group and genus levels,respectively. The false rate was 0. 2%,and the un-identification rate was0. 4%. Conclusions The identification coincidence rate of Enterobacteriaceae by Microflex^TM MALDI-TOF MS is higher than that of Vitek 2 Compact. Using MicroflexTMMALDI-TOF MS to identify Enterobacteriaceae is fast,simple to operate and low-cost,and it can be used in routine rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae in clinical microbiology laboratories.
出处 《检验医学》 CAS 2015年第2期122-127,共6页 Laboratory Medicine
关键词 基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱 肠杆菌科细菌 鉴定 Matrix-assisted laser desorption / ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry Enterobacteriaceae Identification
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1汪复,朱德妹,胡付品,蒋晓飞,胡志东,李全,孙自镛,陈中举,徐英春,张小江,王传清,王爱敏,倪语星,孙景勇,褚云卓,俞云松,林洁,徐元宏,沈继录,苏丹虹,卓超,魏莲花,吴玲,张朝霞,季萍,张泓,孔菁,胡云建,艾效曼,单斌,杜艳.2012年中国CHINET细菌耐药性监测[J].中国感染与化疗杂志,2013,13(5):321-330. 被引量:465
  • 2朱德妹,汪复,胡付品,蒋晓飞,倪语星,孙景勇,徐英春,张小江,胡云健,艾效曼,俞云松,杨青,孙自镛,陈中举,贾蓓,黄文祥,卓超,苏丹虹,魏莲花,吴玲,张朝霞,季萍,王传清,王爱敏,张泓,孔菁,徐元宏,沈继录,单斌,杜艳.2010年中国CHINET细菌耐药性监测[J].中国感染与化疗杂志,2011,11(5):321-329. 被引量:651
  • 3KOWALCHUK GA, DE BRUJIN FJ, HEAD IM, et al. Molecular microbial ecology manual[M].2nd ed. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic,2004:509-522.
  • 4MELLMANN A, CLOUD J, MAIER T, et al. Evaluation of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time-of-flight mass spectrometry in comparison to 16S rRNA gene sequencing for species identification of nonfermenting bacteria [J]. J Clin Microbiol,2008,46(6):1946-1954.
  • 5EIGNER U, HOLFELDER M, OBERDORFER K, et al. Performance of a matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time-of-flight mass spectrometry system for the identification of bacterial isolates in the clinical routine laboratory[J]. Clin Lab,2009,55(7-8):289-296.
  • 6SENG P, DRANCOURT M, GOURIET F, et al. Ongoing revolution in bacteriology: routine identification of bacteria by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry [J]. Clin Infect Dis,2009,49(4):543-551.
  • 7VAN VEEN SQ, CLAAS EC, KUIJPER EJ. High-throughput identification of bacteria and yeast by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry in conventional medical microbiology laboratories [J]. J Clin Microbiol,2010,48(3):900-907.
  • 8BIZZINI A, DURUSSEL C, BILLE J, et al. Performance of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry for identification of bacterial strains routinely isolated in a clinical microbiology laboratory [J]. J Clin Microbiol,2010,48(5):1549-1554.
  • 9POWELL EA, BLECKER-SHELLY D, MONTGOMERY S, et al. Application of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry for identification of the fastidious pediatric pathogens Aggregatibacter, Eikenella, Haemophilus, and Kingella [J]. J Clin Microbiol,2013,51(11):3862-3864.
  • 10MATHER CA, RIVERA SF, BUTLER-WU SM. Comparison of the Bruker Biotyper and Vitek MS matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry systems for identification of Mycobacteria using simplified protein extraction protocols[J]. J Clin Microbiol,2014,52(1):130-138.

二级参考文献32

  • 1Arias CA,Murray BE.Antibiotic-resistant bugs in the 21st century-a clinical super-challenge[J].N Engl J Med,2009,360(5):439-443.
  • 2Clinical and Laboratory Standads Institute.Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing[S].Fifteenth Informational Supplement,2010,M100-S20 Vol 30 No.1.
  • 3Clinical and Laboratory Standads Institute Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing[S].Fifteenth Informational Supplement,2010,M100-S20-U Vol 30 No 15.
  • 4Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute.Methods for Antimicrobial Dilution and Disk Susceptibility Testing of Infrequently Isolated or Fastidious Bacteria[S].Approved Guideline M45-A,Vol.26 No.19,2006.
  • 5Wang P,Hu FP,Xiong ZZ,et al.Susceptibility of ESBL-Producing nterobacteriaceae with the New CLSI Breakpoints[J].J Clin Microbiol,2011,49(6):3127-3131.
  • 6Yang Q,Wang H,Sun H,et al.Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of Enterobacteriaceae with decreased susceptibility to carbapenems:results from large hospital-based surveillance studies in China[J].Antimicrob Agents Chemother,2010,54(1):573-577.
  • 7Wang H.Guo P,Sun HL,et al.Molecular epidemiology of clinical isolates of carbapenem-resistant Acinerobacter spp from Chinese hospitals[J].Antimicrob Agents Chemother.2007,51(11):4022-4028.
  • 8CLSI Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing[S]. Twenty second Informational supplement M100- S22 2012,32(3).
  • 9European Committee on Antimicrobial susceptibility testing, Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diame- ters[S]. Version 2, 2012, valid from 2012-01-01.
  • 10Bush K. Alarming β-lactamase mediated resistance in multi- drug-resistant Enterobacteraceae[J]. Curr Opinion Microbi- oh 2010, 13(5): 558-564.

共引文献1033

同被引文献73

引证文献14

二级引证文献57

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部