期刊文献+

2004年至2013年国内护理领域个体及焦点小组访谈研究论文的报告学质量评价 被引量:5

原文传递
导出
摘要 目的对我国护理领域个体和焦点小组访谈研究论文进行报告学质量评价,以了解其报告学质量现状。方法计算机检索护理领域的个体和焦点小组访谈研究文献,并采用COREQ对所纳入文献进行报告学质量评价。结果检索得到2758篇文献,符合纳入及排除标准的文献共计789篇。分别发表在《中华护理杂志》和《中国实用护理杂志》等19种期刊上。纳入文献中,没有1篇完全符合COREQ的规范要求,主要问题有访谈者个人特征不充分、资料收集过程不详细和缺乏编码树等。结论2004年至2013年,护理领域的质性研究文献数量呈逐年增长趋势,但这些研究报告质量方面存在着不同程度的缺陷,亟待改进。 Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate reporting quality of researches about interviews and focus groups in Chinese nursing field.Methods All nursing specialization journals in China mainland were searched from the inception till December 2013.The search was performed on four Chinese databases:China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database,Chinese Biomedical Literature Database,Wanfang database and VIP database.The reporting quality was assessed according to COREQ standard.Results A total of 2 758 qualitative researches were identified,among which 789 articles accorded with the inclusion and exclusion criterion.These articles were published on 19 journals such as the Chinese Journal of Nursing and the Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing.Non of the articles accorded with the COREQ standard.The flaws of reporting quality were reflected in the inadequate description of personal characteristics,incomplete reporting of data collection and the deficiency of the coding tree.Conclusions From 2004 to 2013,qualitative literature in nursing field increased year-by-year.Till now,most of the qualitative studies on nursing showed flaw of different degrees,which need continuous improvement.
出处 《中国实用护理杂志》 2015年第2期113-118,共6页 Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

二级参考文献81

共引文献140

同被引文献65

引证文献5

二级引证文献45

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部