期刊文献+

腹主动脉旁淋巴结清扫术治疗进展期胃癌的疗效观察 被引量:3

Effectiveness and safety of para-aortic nodal dissection for advanced gastric cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较D2+腹主动脉旁淋巴结清扫术(PAND)与D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌在疗效和安全性方面的差异。方法:纳入分析D2+PAND的胃癌根治术160例,为D2+PAND组,选择同期施行胃癌D2手术病人160例,作为对照组(D2组),比较两组并发症发生率和生存情况。结果:D2+PAND组和D2组平均手术时间分别为(329.9±102.4)min和(266.7±90.6)min,平均输血量分别为(564.7±752.5)m L和(459.3±473.4)m L,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.001)。两组并发症发生率比较差异无统计学意义。D2+PAND组和D2组平均生存期分别为(74.8±7.4)个月和(53.8±4.9)个月(P=0.105),中位生存期为36.4个月和23.4个月(P=0.123),无统计学差异。但是分层分析显示胃癌T4期病人D2+PAND组和D2组平均生存期分别为(28.1±4.6)个月和(17.2±2.8)个月,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),对于合并第2站淋巴结转移的胃癌病人,平均生存期分别为(40.8±5.7)个月和(12.6±2.4)个月,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论:D2+PAND可改善T4期和存在第2站淋巴结转移进展期胃癌病人的预后。 Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of para-aortic lymph node dissection(PAND) for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. Methods D2 gastrectomy with PAND was performed on 160 patients with advanced gastric cancer as D2+PAND group. The other 160 patients were subjected to the D2 operation as D2 group as control. The operative complication and the survival were compared between two groups. Results The average operation time in D2 +PAND group and D2 group was(329.9±102.4) min and(266.7±90.6) min respectively with the statistical difference(P0.001). There was statistical difference of blood transfusion(564.7 ±752.5) m L in D2+PAND group and(459.3 ±473.4) m L in D2 group(P0.001). However, no difference of the operative complication was found between two groups. The average survival was(74.8±7.4) month in D2+PAND group and(53.8±4.9) month in D2 group respectively(P=0.105). The median survival was 36.4 month in D2+PAND group and 23.4 month in D2 group(P=0.123). It was shown with the subgroup analysis that the difference of survival was present between the patients with T4 stage [(28.1±4.6) month in D2+PAND group vs.(17.2±2.8) month in D2 group](P〈0.05) and the patients with second station lymph node metastasis [(40.8 ±5.7) month in D2+PAND group vs.(12.6±2.4) month in D2 group](P〈0.05). Conclusions D2+PAND may offer survival benefit to the advanced gastric cancer patients with T4 stage and with second station lymph node metastasis.
出处 《外科理论与实践》 2015年第1期18-21,共4页 Journal of Surgery Concepts & Practice
基金 国家自然科学基金(81272637)
关键词 胃肿瘤 进展期 腹主动脉旁淋巴结清扫 生存 手术并发症 Stomach neoplasma Advanced Para-aortic lymph node dissection Survival Operative complication
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Sasako M,Sano T, Yamamoto S, et al. D2 lymphadenectomy alone or with para-aortic nodal dissection for gastriccancer[J]. N Engl J Med,2008,359(5):453-462.
  • 2Hartgrink HH, van de Velde CJ, Putter H, et al. Extendedlymph node dissection for gastric cancer: who may bene-fit? Final results of the randomized Dutch gastric cancergroup trial[J]. J Clin Oncol,2004,22(11):2069-2077.
  • 3Hu JK, Yang K,Zhang B, et al. D2 plus para-aortic lym-phadenectomy versus standardized D2 lymphadenectomyin gastric cancer surgery[J]. Surg Today,2009,39(3):207-213.
  • 4詹文华,何裕隆,郑章清,彭俊生,蔡世荣,马晋平.进展期胃癌行腹主动脉旁淋巴结清扫的疗效观察[J].中华外科杂志,2003,41(5):375-378. 被引量:37
  • 5詹文华,韩方海,何裕隆,李玉明,彭俊生,蔡世荣,马晋平.进展期胃癌腹主动脉旁淋巴结转移规律及其清扫对临床结局的影响[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2006,9(1):17-22. 被引量:41
  • 6车向明,夏越祥次,爱甲孝.进展期胃癌腹主动脉旁淋巴结微小转移与患者预后的关系[J].中华外科杂志,2004,42(7):421-423. 被引量:8
  • 7Isozaki H, Okajima K, Fujii K, et al. Effectiveness ofparaaortic lymph node dissection for advanced gastriccancer[J]. Hepatogastroenterology, 1999,46(25):549-554.
  • 8Yonemura Y,Wu CC, Fukushima N,et al. Randomized cli-nical trial of D2 and extended paraaortic lymphadenectomyin patients with gastric cancer[J]. Int J Clin 0ncol.2008,l 3(2):132-137.
  • 9Sano T,Sasako M,Yamamoto S,et al. Gastric cancersurgery: morbidity and mortality results from a prospec-tive randomized controlled trial comparing D2 and ex-tended para-aortic lymphadenectomy-Japan Clinical On-cology Group study 9501 [J]. J Clin 0ncol,2004,22(14):2767-2773.
  • 10Kulig J, Popiela T, Kolodziejczyk P, et al. Standard D2versus extended D2 (D2+) lymphadenectomy for gastriccancer: an interim safety analysis of a multicenter,ran-domized, clinical trial[J]. Am J Surg,2007,93(l): 10-15.

二级参考文献42

  • 1刘统成,郑章清,何裕隆,马晋平,郑朝旭,詹文华.根治性淋巴结清扫治疗早期胃癌的价值——附19例临床分析[J].中国胃肠外科杂志,1999,2(4):220-222. 被引量:3
  • 2Parkin DM.Epidemiology of cancer global patterns and trends.Toxicol Lett,1998,28:102-103,227-234.
  • 3Howson CP,Hiyama T,Wynder EL.The decline in gastric cancer epidemiology of an unplanned triumph.Epidemiol Rev,1986,8:1-27.
  • 4Hartgrink HH,Velde CJH,Putter H,et al.Extended lymph node dissection fro gastric cancer:who may benefit? Final results of the randomized Dutch Gastric Cancer Group Trial.J Clin Oncol,2004,22:2069-2077.
  • 5太田惠一郎,大山繁和,高桥孝,他.胃癌手術の歷史的變遷.消化器外科,1997,22:1175-1184.
  • 6伊藤雅史,平山廉三,前岛静顯,他.解剖学的見地ょりみた胃リンパ系(その 1)-臟侧リンパ系を中心として-.消化器外科,1990,13:1957-1968.
  • 7铃木力,西卷正,神田達夫,他.胃癌術後の乳び瘘,リンバ瘘.手术,2001,55:1137-1142.
  • 8詹文华 汪建平 詹文华 主编.胃癌淋巴结清扫术[A].汪建平,詹文华,主编.胃肠外科手术学.第1版[C].北京:人民卫生出版社,2005.434-443.
  • 9Natsugoe S, Aikou T, Shimazu H. A detailed histological study on occult metastasis of the lymph nodes. Jpn J Surg ,1991, 21: 528-532.
  • 10Kodera Y, Yamamura Y, Shimizu Y, et al. Metastatic gastric lymph node rate is a significant prognostic factor for resectable stage IV stomach cancer. J Am Coll Surg,1997, 185: 65-69.

共引文献86

同被引文献22

引证文献3

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部