摘要
目的:探讨新生儿非头皮静脉输液的可行性。方法:将实施静脉输液的80例患儿,按患儿入院时间随机分为观察组和对照组各40例,观察组在住院期间实施非头皮静脉输液,而对照组实施常规静脉输液。结果:比较2组损伤(包括外渗、皮下血肿、头皮刮伤等)率及部位,观察组损伤率5.3%,其中头部占12.5%,对照组损伤率16.6%,其中头部占41.3%。2组在损伤率及部位等方面的比较均有统计学差异(P<0.05)。结论:废弃新生儿头皮静脉输液是可行的,对减少损伤尤其是头皮损伤及造成的影响有良好效果。
Objective:Investigate the abandon of scalpel venous infusion for neonates.Methods:Select 80 cases of venous infusion for neonates patients, which were hospitalized in neonatal intensive-care unit( NICU) of our hospital during June and Oct of 2012.The neonates patients were divided two groups randomly, one as observation group ( target group) , another one as reference group.Each group has 40 neonates patients.For the neonates patients in observation group, conduct the non-scalpel venous infusion during their medication in hospital while conduct the routine venous infusion for the neonates patients in the reference group.Results:Compare injuries ( inclu-ding extravasation, ecchymoma, scalp scoring, etc) rate and location, and survey the satisfactory rate of the two groups.For observation group, injury rate is 5.3%,among which 12.5%happened at scalp , while for reference group, injury rate is 16.6%,among which 41. 3%happened at scalp.The difference of indwelling needle use rate, injury rate and injury location between the two groups achieved statis-tical significance(P〈0.05).Conclusion:Abandon scalpel venous infusion for neonates is feasible.This may decrease the possible vein injury, specially the scalpel vein injury and will raise the medication quality for neonates patients.
出处
《中国伤残医学》
2015年第5期29-30,共2页
Chinese Journal of Trauma and Disability Medicine
关键词
废弃
新生儿
头皮静脉输液
Abandon
Neonates
Scalpel venous infusion