期刊文献+

都市农业发展水平评价研究综述 被引量:19

REVIEW ON EVALUATION OF THE DEVELOPMENT LEVEL OF URBAN AGRICULTURE
下载PDF
导出
摘要 都市农业发展水平的评价本质上是对都市农业发展过程及结果的确定、识别及评定的过程。该文阐述了国内外都市农业发展水平评价指标体系选取的原则与方法,在此基础上,综述了都市农业发展水平评价指标体系选取的方法和范围。研究认为,都市农业发展水平评价指标体系选取的标准依作者对都市农业理解的不同而各有侧重,在评价方法上主要有层次分析法、信息熵法、综合指数法、幂函数法等。指标体系选取主要有定性和定量两类方法,权重赋值上也有较强的主观性,指标更侧重于经济产出类指标,除了生产、经济功能之外,对都市农业的观光、社会、文化等多功能性指标重视不够。都市农业发展水平评价指标涉及的范围较广泛,既有宏观的洲际、国家及城市层面,也有更微观的实体经济如都市农民及都市社区层面等。因此,评价的过程及评价的方法应多选择数学模型的构建和使用,降低指标评价的主观性,评价指标突出都市农业的多功能性特征。 The evaluation of the development level of urban agriculture is to determinate,identify and evaluate the development process and result of urban agriculture. The core of the scientific and reasonable evaluation of urban agriculture development level is the evaluation index system. Based on selection standards and methods of urban agricultural development level evaluation index system,this paper reviewed the evaluation methods,evaluation scale and indicator selection. The results showed that the design of evaluation index system of the urban agricultural development level was different because the designers had different understanding of urban agriculture. Evaluation methods mainly included the analytic hierarchy process,entropy method,composite index method,power function method,etc. It had qualitative and quantitative analysis methods to select the index system. The weight assignment had strong subjectivity,and the selection of most of the urban agricultural evaluation indicators only considered the agricultural economic indicators,but could not reflect the key evaluation index for connotation and characteristics of urban agriculture,such as leisure sightseeing,social and cultural indicators etc. The development evaluation of urban agriculture scope was broad including not only the intercontinental,macro,state and city level,but also micro entity economy such as urban farmers and urban community level,etc. So the evaluation process and evaluation method should select more mathematical models and reduce the subjectivity of index evaluation. In addition,to evaluate urban agriculture should strengthen the horizontal comparison with the development of urban agriculture in different cities.
出处 《中国农业资源与区划》 北大核心 2015年第1期44-49,共6页 Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71303118) 上海市科委软科学重点课题(13692105100 14692103700) 上海市哲学社会科学规划项目(2014BJB010) 上海市科技兴农推广项目[沪农科推字(2012)第5-4号]
关键词 都市农业 评价指标体系 研究综述 urban agriculture evaluation index system reviewing
  • 相关文献

参考文献37

  • 1BML (Bundesministerium fur Emahrung, Landwirtschaft und Forsten) Synoptic Portrait of Similarities of the Contents of Existing Criteria and Indicator Catalogues for Sustainable Forest Management. Background Paper by the Federal Ministry of Food, Agriculture, and Forestry, Bonn, prepared with assistance from the Federal Research Center for Forestry and Forest Industry, 1995.
  • 2Christian Azar,John Holmberg, Kristian Lindgren.. Socio-ecologica indicators for sustainability. Ecological Economics 1996, 18:89 - 112.
  • 3Bernstein, B. B. A Framework for Trend Detection : Coupling Ecological and Managerial Perspectives. In Ecological Indicators, edited by D. Iq. McKenzie, D.E. Hyatt, and V. J, McDonald, 1992, (2): 1101 -1 114.
  • 4Dalsgaard J P T, Lighffoot C, Christensen V. Towards Quantification of Ecological Sustainability in Farming Systems Analysis. Ecological Engi- neering, 1995, 4 (3): 181 -189.
  • 5Isabelle Vagneron, Economic Appraisal of Profitability and Sustainability of Perl-urban Agriculture in Bangkok. Ecological Economics, 2007, 61 : 516 - 529.
  • 6Barbara Beeker. Sustainability Assessment: A Review of Values, Concepts, and Methodological Approaches. Issues in Agriculture 10. Wash- ington, D.C. : Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research, 1997.
  • 7Angeles, L. C. The Struggle for sustainable livelihood, gender and organic urban agriculture in Valencia City, Philippines. Urban Agriculture Magazine, 6, 2002.
  • 8Moustier,P. Assessing the Socio-economic Impact of Urban and peri-urban Agricultural Development. Paper submitted to the Workshop on Appro- priate Methodology in Urban Agriculture Research, Planning, Implementation and Evaluation, Nairobi, Kenya, organized by CIP-SUIPa and etc. RUAF, 2001.
  • 9韩士元.都市农业的内涵特征和评价标准[J].天津社会科学,2002(2):85-87. 被引量:39
  • 10王静,赵淑杰.天津都市型现代农业发展水平评价[J].科技与经济,2012,25(5):57-61. 被引量:6

二级参考文献139

共引文献232

同被引文献226

引证文献19

二级引证文献101

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部