摘要
目的系统评价单一及联合使用抗生素治疗呼吸机相关性肺炎(ventilator-associated pneumonia,VAP)的效果。方法应用计算机检索PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane library、中国生物医学文献数据库、中国期刊全文数据库、万方数据库1990年1月—2014年3月发表的相关文献,对符合标准的文献,由2名评价员应用Jadad量表评价文献质量,应用Revoew Manager5.2软件进行Meta分析。结果共纳入文献6篇,Jadad量表评分均高于4分,共1 190例患者,其中联合抗生素治疗组(联合组)624例,单一抗生素治疗组(对照组)566例;Meta分析结果显示,2组病死率(RR=0.98,95%CI:0.80~1.20,P=0.87)、治愈率(RR=1.11,95%CI:0.65~1.92,P=0.70)、ICU留治时间(MD=-0.72,95%CI:-5.23~3.78,P=0.75)、机械通气时间(MD=-0.37,95%CI:-4.15~3.42,P=0.85)差异无统计学意义。结论对VAP患者,推荐常规选用恰当抗菌谱的单一抗生素治疗。
Objective To evaluate the effect of antibiotic combination therapy vs monotherapy on ventilator-associated pneumonia(VAP)by a meta-analysis.Methods The relevant literatures from January 1990 to March 2014 were retrieved in the PubMed,EMBASE,Cochrane library,CBM and NKIMEDLINE.All articles were assessed the quality by two reviewers with Jadad.The meta-analysis was performed and the results of the trials were analyzed by the Revoew Manager 5.2software.Results In 6extracted articles with Jadad score 4,a total of 1 190 patients were included and were divided into combination therapy group(n=624)and monotherapy group(n=566).Meta-analysis revealed there were no significant differences in the fatality of VAP(RR=0.98,95%CI:0.80 to 1.20,P=0.87),the curative rate of VAP(RR=1.11,95%CI:0.65 to 1.92,P=0.70),the ICU stay(MD=-0.72,95%CI:-5.23 to 3.78,P=0.75)and the duration of mechanical ventilation(MD=-0.37,95%CI:-4.15 to 3.42,P=0.85)between two groups.ConclusionIt is recommended for VAP to choose antibiotic monotherapy of appropriate antimicrobial spectrum.
出处
《中华实用诊断与治疗杂志》
2015年第2期192-195,共4页
Journal of Chinese Practical Diagnosis and Therapy
基金
中华医学会临床医学科研专项基金(11030120256)