期刊文献+

前列腺癌术后Gleason评分升高研究现状

原文传递
导出
摘要 随着PSA筛查的普及,前列腺癌检出率呈逐渐增高的趋势,前列腺癌主要依靠前列腺穿刺活检确诊.确诊患者中,有一部分患者肿瘤恶性度较低,一部分则具有较高的侵袭性,其治疗、管理方案也不尽相同.前列腺穿刺标本的Gleason评分被认为是前列腺癌预后评估的重要参数,对前列腺癌治疗方案的选择具有重要的指导作用.但是,越来越多的研究表明,前列腺穿刺标本与根治术后病理标本的Gleason评分具有不同程度的差异,
出处 《中华泌尿外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第2期158-160,共3页 Chinese Journal of Urology
  • 相关文献

参考文献30

  • 1Noguchi M, Stamey TA, Mcneal JE, et al. Relationship between systematic biopsies and histological features of 222 radical prosta- tectomy specimens: lack of prediction of tumor significance for men with nonpalpable prostate cancer [ J]. J Urol, 2001, 166: 104-110.
  • 2陈超,谢立平,郑祥毅,林奕伟,朱翮嘉,汪朔,沈柏华,蔡柏森,尤启汉.前列腺特异性抗原密度预测首次前列腺活检标本Gleason评分升高的价值[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2013,34(10):755-759. 被引量:9
  • 3Epstein JI, Allsbrook WJ, Amin MB, et al. Update on the Glea-son grading system for prostate cancer: results of an international consensus conference of urologic pathologists [ J ]. Adv Anat Pathol, 2006, 13: 57-59.
  • 4孙娟娟,王朝夫,张慧芝,戴波.前列腺癌穿刺标本与对应根治标本Gleason评分符合率的研究[J].中国癌症杂志,2012,22(12):929-933. 被引量:11
  • 5Epstein Jl, Allsbrook W J, Amin MB, et al. The 2005 Interna- tional Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Confe- rence on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma [ J]. Am J Surg Pathol, 2005, 29: 1228-1242.
  • 6Epstein JI. An update of the Gleason grading system [ J]. J Urol, 2010, 183: 433-440.
  • 7Dong F, Wang C, Fan'is AB, et al. Impact on the clinical out- come of prostate cancer by the 2005 international society of uro logical pathology modified Gleason grading system [ J ]. AO J Surg Pathol, 2012, 36: 838-843.
  • 8Billis A, Guimaraes MS, Freitas LL, et al. The impact of the 2005 international society of urological pathology consensus conference on standard Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma in needle biop- sies [J]. J Urol, 2008, 180: 548-553.
  • 9Uemura H, Hoshino K, Sasaki T, et al. Usefulness of the 2005 International Society of Urologic Pathology Gleason grading system in prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens [ J]. BJU Int, 2009, 103: 1190-1194..
  • 10Moussa AS, Li J, Soriano M, et al. Prostate biopsy clinical and pathological variables that predict significant grading changes in patients with intermediate and high grade prostate cancer [ J ]. BJU Int, 2009, 103: 43-48.

二级参考文献91

  • 1叶定伟,李长岭.前列腺癌发病趋势的回顾和展望[J].中国癌症杂志,2007,17(3):177-180. 被引量:119
  • 2Eskew LA, Bare RL, McCullough DL. Systematic 5 region prostate biopsy is superior to sextant method diagnosing carcinoma of the prostate. J Urol, 1997, 157: 199- 202.
  • 3Noguchi M, Stamey TA, McNeal JE, et al. Relationship between systematic biopsies and histological features of 222 radi cal prostatectomy specimens: lack of prediction of tumor sig nificance for men with nonpalpable prostate cancer. J Urol 2001, 166: 104-109.
  • 4Emiliozzi P, Maymone S, Paterno A, et al. Increased accuracy of biopsy Gleason score obtained by extended needle biopsy. J Urol, 2004, 172(6 Pt 1): 2224 -2226.
  • 5Epstein Jl, Potter SR. The pathological interpretation and signlficance of prostate needle biopsy findings: implications and current controversies. J Urol, 2001, 166: 402-410.
  • 6Mir MC, Planas J, Raventos CX, et al. Is there a relationship between prostate volume and Gleason score? BJU Int, 2008, 102: 563-565.
  • 7Epstein JI, Sanderson H, Carter HB, et al. Utility of saturation biopsy to predict insignificant cancer at radical prostateeto my. Urology, 2005, 66: 356-360.
  • 8Numao N, Kawakami S, Yokoyama M, et al. Improved accuracy in predicting the presence of Gleason pattern 4/5 prostate cancer by three-dimensional 26 core systematic biopsy. Eur Urol, 2007, 52:1663-1668.
  • 9Jones JS, Patel A, Schoenfield L, et al. Saturation technique does not improve cancer detection as an Initial prostate biopsy strategy. J Urol, 2006, 171: 485-488.
  • 10Eskew LA, Bare RL, McCullough DL. Systematic 5 region prostate biopsy is superior to sextant method diagnosing carcinoma of the prostate. J Urol 1997; 157(1): 199-202.

共引文献44

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部