摘要
目的探讨手法干预对新生儿听力筛查结果的影响。方法将659例新生儿中家长已签订知情同意协议书者318例纳入干预组,未签订者341例纳入对照组。对照组采用常规听力筛查方法,干预组在对照组基础上给予手法干预。比较两组筛查的pass率、测试过程所用时间和假阳性率间的差异。结果观察组听力筛查pass率、测试过程所用时间及转诊率与对照组比较,差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论手法干预的应用能提高新生儿听力筛查pass率和测试速度及工作效率。
Objective To investigate the effect of manipulative intervention on the passing rate of the newborn heating screen- ing. Methods A total of 659 newborns were divided into two groups. Some were designated as the intervention group (n = 318 ) whose parents signed informed consent agreement in the newborns, the others were designated as the control group (n = 341 ) . Routine screening was taken in the control group and manipulative intervention was additionally applied in intervention group. The passing rate, test process used time, and the rate of referral were compared between the two groups. Results There were statistically significant differences in the comparison of the passing rate, test process used time and the rate of referral between the two groups ( P 〈 0. 05 ) . Conclusion Manipulative intervention can improve the passing rate and speed of newborn hearing screening, improve the efficiency of screening,
出处
《国际护理学杂志》
2015年第3期293-295,共3页
international journal of nursing
关键词
手法干预
新生儿
听力筛查
假阳性率
Manipulative intervention
Newborn
Hearing screening
The false positive rate