期刊文献+

价值导向记忆:方法、进展与理论解释

Value-directed Remembering: Method, Progress and Theoretical Explanation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 价值导向记忆指的是选择性的分配注意及认知资源于高价值信息上(相较于低价值信息)的一种记忆活动,以往研究均采用选择性任务范式探讨价值导向记忆,并提出选择、优化和补偿理论,优先回忆模型,元认知修正注意假说,差异性资源分配假说及信息减少假说解释价值导向记忆。但由于关注角度不同,已有理论并不能充分说明价值导向记忆的加工机制,且未得到充分的验证。未来研究应进一步验证价值导向记忆的理论假说,并考察价值导向记忆的神经机制。 The process of value-directed remembering(VDR) involves selectively attending to and recalling high-value information relative to lower-value information. The existing research of VDR used the selectivity paradigm and put forward the metacognition modifying attention(MMA), the selection, optimization and compensation framework(SOC), a priority-recall model(PRM), differential resource allocation hypothesis(DR) and information reduction hypotheses(ID), in order to explain the VDR. However, all of the hypotheses could not reveal the processing mechanism of VDR from different angles. Further researches are expected to explore the theoretical explanation of VDR and its neural mechanism.
出处 《宁波大学学报(教育科学版)》 2015年第2期6-11,共6页 Journal of Ningbo University(Educational Science Edition)
关键词 价值导向记忆 选择性任务 元认知 年老化 神经机制 value-directed remembering selectivity paradigm metacognition aging neural mechanism
  • 相关文献

参考文献27

  • 1NAIRNE JAMES S, THOMPSON SARAH R, PANDERIADA, et al. Adaptive memory: Survival processingenhances retention[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 2007, 33(2): 263-273.
  • 2CASTEL A D, MCGILLIVARAY S, FRIEDMAN M C. Metamemory and memory efficiency in older adults: Learning about the benefits of priority processing and value-directed remembering [M]//M. Naveb-Benjamin & N. Ohta (Eds.), Memory and aging: Current Issues and future directions. New York: Psychology/Press, 2012: 243-268.
  • 3DUNLOSKY J, MSTCALFE J. Metacognition. Thousand Oaks, [M].CA: Sage Publications, Inc.2009:1-3.
  • 4NELSON T O, NARENS L. Why investigate metacognition? [M]//J. Metcalfe and A.P. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1994: 1-25.
  • 5KORIAT A, MA'AYAN H, NUSSINSON R. The imricate relationship between monitoring and control in metacognition: Lessons for the cause-and-effect relation between subjective experience and behavior [J].Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2006, 135: 36-69.
  • 6SODERSTROM, NICHOLAS C, MCCABE. The interplay between value and relatedness as bases for metacognitive monitoring and control: Evidence for agenda-based monitoring [J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2011, 37(5): 1236-1242.
  • 7MCGILLIVARY S, CASTEL A D. Betting on memory leads to metacognitive improvement by younger and older adults [J]. Psychol Aging, 2011, 26(1): 137-142.
  • 8Ariel Robert, Dunlosky, John, et al. Agenda-based regulation of study-time allocation: When agendas override item-based monitoring [J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2009, 138(3): 432-447.
  • 9牛勇,邱香,傅小兰.不同时间限制下分值对学习时间分配的影响[J].心理科学,2010,33(4):815-818. 被引量:10
  • 10CASTEL A D, MURAYAMA K, FRIEDMAN M C, et al. Selecting valuable information to remember: Age-related differences and similarities in self-regulated learning [J]. Psychology and Aging, 2013, 28(1 ): 232-242.

二级参考文献19

  • 1储衡清,周晓林.注意捕获与自上而下的加工过程[J].心理科学进展,2004,12(5):680-687. 被引量:23
  • 2Brown, A. L., Bransford, j. D., Ferrara, R. A., & Campione J. C. (1983). Learning remembering, and understanding. In J. H. Flavell & E. M. Markham (Eds.) Handbook of child psycholofy: Vol Ⅲ. Cognitive developmen. (pp. 77 - 166). New York: Wiley.
  • 3Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L., (1990). Metamemory A theoretical framework and new Findings. In: Bower, G H. (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation voi. 26 (pp. 125-141) Academic Press, New York.
  • 4Le Ny, J. F., Denhiere, G., & I.,e Taillanter, D. (1972). Regulation of study-time and interstimulus.similarity in self paced learning conditions. Acta Psychologica, 36, 280- 289.
  • 5Dunlosky, J., & Thiede, K. W. (1998). What makes people study more: An evaluation of factors that affect people' s self - paced study and yield "labor - and - gain' ' effects. Acta Psychologica, 98, 37-56.
  • 6Metcalfe, J. (2002). Is study time allocated selectively to a region of proximal learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 349 - 363.
  • 7Metcalfe, J., & Kornell, N, (2005). A Region of Proximal Learning model of study time allocation. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 63- 477.
  • 8Nelson, T. O., Leonesio, R.J. (1988). Allocation of self - paced study time and the "labor - in - vain effect". Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 14, 676-686.
  • 9Castel A D. The adaptive and strategic use of memory by older adults: Evaluative processing and value-directed remembering[-C]//In A. S. Benjamin B. H. Ross (Eds.). The psychology of learning and motivation. London, England : Academic Press, 2008.
  • 10Castel A D,Farb N,Craik F I M. Memory for general and specific value information in younger and older adults: Measuring the limits of strategic control [J]. Memory I Cognition, 2007,35 (4).

共引文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部