期刊文献+

鼻泪管阻塞三种不同手术方式的临床观察 被引量:7

Effects of three surgical approaches on nasolacrimal duct obstruction
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨三种不同手术方式治疗鼻泪管阻塞的临床疗效观察。方法对156例鼻泪管阻塞患者随机分为三组,分别行三种不同手术方式:A组行泪道激光手术;B组行鼻泪管支架植入术;C组行内窥镜下鼻腔泪囊吻合术。术后随访,观察术后18个月时间的术后临床效果。结果泪道激光术后的有效率为73.3%;鼻泪管支架植入术的有效率为88.3%;内窥镜下鼻腔泪囊吻合术的有效率为98.3%。结论三种手术方式都有各自的优点,泪道激光手术操作简单,适合在条件有限的基层医院推广;鼻泪管支架植入术适合在条件稍好的地市级医院推广,内窥镜下鼻腔泪囊吻合术是一种微创、安全、疗效好的手术方法,值得在有条件的医院临床上广泛推广。 【Objective】To compare clinical efficacy of three surgical approaches on nasolacrimal duct obstruction.【Methods】A total of 156 cases of nasolacrimal duct obstruction were randomly divided into three group, group A was treated with Nd: YAG laser, group B was treated with nasolacrimal stent, group C was treated with dacryocystorhinostomy under nasal endoscope. A follow-up of 18 months was conducted on all the patients to observe the clinical effects after operation. 【Results】The total efficacy of group A was 73.3%, the total efficacy of group B was 88.3%, the total efficacy of group C was 98.3%.【Conclusions】Nd: YAG laser is worth for application in basic hospitals of limited conditions. Nasolacrimal stent is worth for application in municipal hospitals of better conditions. Dacryocystorhinostomy under nasal endoscope is minimally invasive,safe with good curative effect, which is worth for application in large scale.
作者 邓里 岳辉
出处 《中国现代医学杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2015年第3期83-85,共3页 China Journal of Modern Medicine
关键词 鼻泪管阻塞 泪道激光 鼻泪管支架植入术 内窥镜下鼻腔泪囊吻合术 nasolacrimal duct obstruction Nd: YAG laser nasolacrimal stent dacryocystorhinostomy under nasal endoscope
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献72

共引文献59

同被引文献82

  • 1Dima Andalib,Hossein Mansoori.A comparison between monocanalicular and pushed monocanalicular silicone intubation in the treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction[J].International Journal of Ophthalmology(English edition),2014,7(6):1039-1042. 被引量:13
  • 2赵启顺,张丽.泪道阻塞340个家系遗传方式的调查[J].国际眼科杂志,2005,5(6):1279-1280. 被引量:4
  • 3匡大立,尹忠贵,吴晓红.KTP激光泪道疏通术后泪道扩张冲洗频率对其疗效的影响[J].眼科新进展,2006,26(11):848-850. 被引量:11
  • 4Naik SM, Appaji MK, Mushannavar AS,et al. Endonasal DCR with silicon tube stents : A better management for acute lacrimal abscesses [ J ]. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2013,65 (2) :343-349. DOI: 10. 1007/ s12070-0 12-0507-8.
  • 5Han BL, Shin HS. Dacryocystocele with congenital unilateral lacrimal punc- ta agenesis in an adults [ J ]. J Craniofac Surg, 2013,24 (4) : 1242,1243. DOI: 10. 1097/SCS. 0b013e31828b717b.
  • 6Entesarian M, Dahlqvist J, Shashi V, et al. FGFIO missense mutations in aplasia of lacrimal and salivary gland[J]. European Journal of Human Ge- netic,2007,15:379-382. DOI: 10. 1038/sj. ej hg. 520 1762.
  • 7Elmann S, Hanson SA, Bunce CN, et al. Ectrodactyly ectodermal dysplasia clefting (EEC) syndrome: a rare cause of congenital lacrimal anomalies [J]. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg, 2015,31 (2) :e35-37.
  • 8Aldahash FD, Muhammad F. A1-Mubarakaad MF, et al. Risk factors for de- veloping congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction [ J ]. Sandi Journal of Oph- thalmology,2014,28:58-60. DOI : 10. 1016/j. sjopt. 2013.09. 007.
  • 9Bachelard-Serra M, Chau C, Farinettl A, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of congen- ital dacryocystocele [ J ]. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhionlaryngolo- gy,2013,77(5) :847-849. DOI: 10. 1016/j. ijporl. 2013.01.012.
  • 10Takahashi Y, Matsuda H, Nakamura Y, et al. Dacryoendoscopic findings of lacrimal passage with congenital punctal atresia [ J ]. Orbit, 2013,32 ( 5 ) : 338-340. DOI: 10. 3109/01676830.2013. 815228.

引证文献7

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部