新古典制度均衡理论不能指导转型实践的定性分析与启示

The Qualitative Analysis and Enlightenment about the Equilibrium Theory of New-institutional Economics Can't Guide Transition Practices

舒尔茨、诺斯、戴维斯等经济学家运用新古典供求分析方法建构的制度均衡理论,在形式上虽然具有完美性,但受微观和边际分析的局限,其所研究的制度变迁在内容、方式、动力和性质等四个方面与转型国家的转型存在巨大差异。鉴于此,转型国家只有突破新古典制度均衡理论的边际分析框架,着眼于制度结构并发挥政府作为制度供给者的积极作用,才能确保经济体制平稳转型。

Schultz,North,Davies and other economists using the supply-demand analysis method to construct the institutional equilibrium theory,although it has the perfect in form,but subject to the limitations of micro and marginal analysis,there are great differences in four aspects of the institutional change between the transition of the transition countries,such as content,mode,dynamic and nature. In view of this,the transition countries only breakthrough the marginal analysis framework of the equilibrium theory of new-institutional economics,focusing on the system structure and play the positive role of the government as a system supplier,to ensure a smooth transition of the economic system.