摘要
目的:分析中文版围产期悲伤量表( PGS)在不良妊娠孕妇中应用的信效度。方法经过原量表的翻译、回译及文化调适后制订中文版PGS,选取170例不良妊娠孕妇为样本一,进行项目分析和探索性因子分析;另选取110例不良妊娠孕妇为样本二,进行验证性因子分析及信度分析。结果除第5条(我需要与人谈论宝宝)外,其余32个条目与总量表的相关系数均较高( r=0.307~0.659)。探索性因子分析表示,提取的2个因子累积方差贡献率为60.82%;验证性因子分析结果为χ2/df =2.21, RMSEA=0.058,NFI=0.910,GFI=0.900,CFI=0.920。结论中文版围产期悲伤量表信效度良好,适用于对不良妊娠孕妇进行心理评价。
Objective To analyze the reliability and validity of Chinese Version of Perinatal Grief Scale ( PGS) in abnormal pregnant women .Methods After translating the original scale , we applied the back translation and cultural adaptation .Totals of 170 prenatal loss women were surveyed to analyze the item and exploratory factors .Another 110 cases were surveyed to do confirmatory factor analysis and reliability analysis . Results Except for the fifth item, the remaining 32 items and the correlation coefficient of total scale were higher (r=0.307 -0.659).Two factors were extracted from exploratory factors analysis , accounting for a cumulative variance contribution rate of 60.82%.The results of confirmatory factor analysis were χ2/df=2.21, RMSEA=0.058, NFI=0.910, GFI=0.900, CFI=0.920.Conclusions The Chinese Version of PGS had good reliability and validity , and it is suitable for psychological assessment of abnormal pregnant women .
出处
《中华现代护理杂志》
2014年第19期2323-2326,共4页
Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
关键词
不良妊娠
围产期悲伤量表
信度
效度
Abnormal pregnancy
Perinatal grief scale
Reliability
Validity