论刑法的司法逻辑精神——《刑法》前五条之总体理解

The Study of Criminal Law's Spirit of Judicial Logic——the Integrated Understanding of Criminal Law's Anterior Five Articles

司法逻辑是一种客观逻辑,刑法的司法逻辑精神是一种客观精神,对此要在刑法自身结构中的自生性(内部性)与建构性(外部性)的矛盾中理解。《刑法》第1条乃是这种精神之总成,其中"结合"与"为了"之表述体现此精神尤为明显。在司法逻辑中,控方以《刑法》第2条为总依据的追诉偏好刑法的外部性,而辩方所偏好的则是刑法的内部性。内部论的刑法本体论和无知论的刑法认识论是理解《刑法》第3至5条罪刑法定主义的司法逻辑的哲学基础。实现刑事正义的关键不在于刑法确定不确定,而在于摆脱独断论、图像论、刑法外部性等种种束缚,从主体间性、语境论、刑法内部性上发现刑事正义的司法逻辑进路。

Judicial logic is one kind of objective logics, and Criminal Law＇ s spirit of judicial logic is also objective, which demands the understanding of contradiction between Criminal Law＇ s spontaneity （ internal nature） and nature of construction （ externality）. The first article is the quintessence of this spirit, in which the statements such as ＂related with＂ and ＂in order to＂ are the distinct reflections. In judicial logic, the prosecuting party leans to Criminal Law＇ s externality according to the second article, while the accused party prefers Criminal Law＇ s internal nature. The philosophical foundation to understand the third to the fifth article＇ s judicial logic - statutory crime and punishment in Criminal Law is the internal theory＇ s ontology and ignorance＇ s epistemology. The key to achieve criminal justice is not Criminal Law＇ s clarity, but of releasing control of dogmatism, the theory of image and externality, meanwhile, of discovering the path to criminal justice＇ s judicial logic from inter - subjectivity, contex- tual theory and Criminal Law＇ s internal nature.