期刊文献+

确立与完善我国证券侵权仲裁机制的路径分析——以美国证券仲裁机制的发展为视角 被引量:8

Study on Improvement in China's Arbitration Mechanism for Securities Tort Dispute
原文传递
导出
摘要 证券市场上侵权法律关系具有可仲裁性,在司法不足以充分及时救济投资受损权益的情况下,应充分发挥证券仲裁的替代性优势。借鉴美国等发达资本市场证券仲裁体制及完善的路径,我国在立法中应尽快确立证券行业仲裁模式,在政府部门监管下由行业自律组织主导证券仲裁规则的制定与实施。证券行业仲裁不等于行业垄断仲裁,证券仲裁与公共仲裁之间系良性竞争关系,通过行业自律、行政监管和司法保障等措施,切实保障证券侵权仲裁的公正性,维护广大投资者的利益和证券市场的运行秩序。 It' s increasingly known that securities tort dispute is arbitrable. Securities arbitration system should be introduced and brought into full play for the interests of those infringed and manipulated investors especially when they are lacking effective access to judicial relief. Securities tort arbitration mechanism can be industry - directed and self regulated under the supervision of CSRC. Securities tort arbitration is not of compulsory nature and investors are entitled to the opportunity to seek other public arbitration organs for relief, even access to civil litigation according to mandatory statues. Industry self regulation, administrative supervision and appropriate judicial intervention are necessary to safeguard the justice and fairness in regard of securities arbitration, as well as good order in securities market.
作者 王克玉
出处 《法学论坛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第2期109-118,共10页 Legal Forum
基金 司法部专项课题<金融创新体制下的证券仲裁机制研究>(09SFB5027)的部分成果
关键词 证券侵权 纠纷解决 仲裁机制 立法完善 securities tort dispute resolution arbitration mechanism legislation improvement
  • 相关文献

参考文献48

  • 1Alan Redfem & Martin Hunter, Law and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration, Sweet & Maxwell ( 1986), ppl05 - 106.
  • 2Wilko v. Swan, 346 U. S. 427 (1953).
  • 3Karen Kupersmith, A Perspective on the Role of the Arbitration in Securities Arbitration, 31 Wake Forest L. Rev. (1996), p297.
  • 4Karen Kupersmith, A Perspective on the Role of the Arbitration in Securities Arbitration, 31 Wake Forest L. Rev. (1996), p298.
  • 5Shearson/American Express, Inc. v. Mcmahon, 482 U.S. 220 (1987).
  • 6Rodriguez de Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc. , 89. 490 U. S. 477,484 (1989).
  • 7MeMahon, 482 US pp233 - 234 (1987).
  • 81934年《证券交易法》第29节(a)项.
  • 9德国《证券交易法案》.
  • 10韩国《证券和交易法》.

二级参考文献3

引证文献8

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部