期刊文献+

宏观经济波动对企业生存绩效的影响:顺周期效应考察 被引量:4

Whether the Survival Performance of New Firms Cause Procyclicality: An Empirical Analysis Based on Manufacturing Industry in Guangzhou
下载PDF
导出
摘要 利用1999—2010年广州市新成立制造业企业数据,运用事件史分析方法考察宏观经济波动对企业生存绩效的影响。同时,采用非参数模型KM模型比较不同类型企业的生存状况,选择半参数模型Cox比例风险模型探究企业生存绩效的顺周期效应,使用加速失效时间模型检验了Cox比例风险模型估计结果的稳健性。研究结果表明:企业生存绩效经历了顺周期效应;资金技术密集型企业生存绩效好于劳动密集型企业,但更易受到宏观经济波动的影响;外资企业较内资企业面临更高的死亡风险,且对宏观经济波动反应更敏感。 The paper investigates how macroeconomic fluctuations influences survival performance of new firms. Based on History analysis, this study then conducts an empirical analysis on the survival status of new manufacturing firms in Guangzhou from 1999 to 2010. Using KM model to compare the survival performance of different types of finns and cox proportional hazard model to explore the pro - cyclical effect of survival performance and accelerated failure time model to test the robustness of results. The results show that the survival performance of new firms experiences the pro - cyclical effect ; Capital technology - intensive firms live better than labor - intensive ones, but they are more responsive to macroeconomic fluctuations; Foreign firms have a higher risk of death than domestic ones and are more vulnerable to fluctuations. C
作者 彭璧玉 张慧
出处 《贵州财经大学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第2期41-51,共11页 Journal of Guizhou University of Finance and Economics
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目"企业种群密度与企业生态位宽度对组织死亡的交互作用研究"(13YJAZH069) 广东省自然科学基金项目"珠三角地区制造业企业的死亡风险研究--基于组织生态学的视角"(S2012010008757) 广州市社科基金项目"广州市制造业企业的死亡风险研究--基于组织生态学的视角"(2012YB02)
关键词 生存绩效 顺周期效应 事件史分析 COX比例风险模型 制造业 survival performance procyclicality history analysis cox proportional hazard model manufacturing industry
  • 相关文献

参考文献30

  • 1Geroski P A. What do we know about entry? [J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 1995, 13(4) :421 - 440.
  • 2Colombo M G, Grilli L. Founders' human capital and the growth of new technology - based firms : A competence - based view [ J ]. Research policy, 2005, 34 (6) : 795 - 816.
  • 3Dunne P, Hughes A. Age, size, growth and survival: UK companies in the 1980s[ J ]. The Journal of Industrial Econom- ics, 1994 : 115 - 140.
  • 4唐根丽.企业自主创新能力对创新绩效的影响研究[J].内蒙古财经学院学报,2012(1):30-34. 被引量:6
  • 5张望.技术差距、政府补贴与企业自主创新强度[J].贵州财经大学学报,2014(2):79-90. 被引量:7
  • 6陈金勇,汤湘希,金成隆.区域、自主创新与企业价值[J].山西财经大学学报,2014,36(3):11-20. 被引量:14
  • 7Malerba F, Orsenigo L. Technological Entry, Exit and Survival: An Empirical Analysis of Patent Data[ J ]. Research Poli- cy, 1999, 28(6) : 643 -660.
  • 8Licht G, Nerlinger E. New Technology - based Firms in Germany: A Survey of the Recent Evidence [ J ]. Research Poli- cy, 1998, 26(9) : 1005 - 1022.
  • 9Agarwal R, Gort M. Firm and Product Life Cycles and Firm Survival[ J]. American Economic Review, 2002:184 - 190.
  • 10Boeri T, Bellmann L. Post - entry Behaviour and the Cycle: Evidence from Germany [ J ]. International Journal of Indus- trial Organization, 1995, 13 (4) : 483 - 500.

二级参考文献73

共引文献24

同被引文献67

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部