固定手术与保守治疗肋骨骨折的对比研究

The Comparative Study on Internal Fixation Operation and Conventional in Treatment of Rib Fractures

目的：探讨内固定手术与保守治疗肋骨骨折的对比研究。方法选取2013年11月～2014年11月我院接诊的33例肋骨骨折患者，按照入院的先后顺序分为两组，实验组和对照组，实验组采用内固定手术，对照组采用保守治疗，观察两组患者的治疗效果。结果实验组患者的总有效率明显高于对照组，差异显著，有统计学意义（P〈0.05）；实验组患者的疼痛时间、住院时间、住院费用、并发症的发生率明显低于对照组，差异显著，有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。结论内固定手术治疗肋骨骨折的效果显著，有效缩短患者的疼痛时间和住院时间，降低并发症的发生率。

Objective Comparative study on internal fixation operation and conventional in treatment of bib fractures is to be discussed.MethodsChoose 33 patients with rib fractures who are treated in hospital from November 2013 to November 2014 and separate them into study group and control group according to their hospitalization sequence. Patients in study group are given internal fixation operation treatment,while patients in control group are given conventional treatment; and then observe and compare the treatment efficacy of these two groups.ResultsThe treatment efficacy in study group is much higher than that in control group; there is a treatment differential between the two groups,and such a differential has statistic value（P〈0.05）. besides,patients’ pain-enduring time,hospitalization time and expense,and complication incidence in study group are much lower and less than those in control group; there is a treatment differential between the two groups,and such a differential has statistic value（P〈0.05）.Conclusion Internal fixation operation is quite effective in treatment of patients with rib fracture; it is conducive to shortening patients’ pain-enduring time and hospitalization time,and reducing complication incidence as wel; internal fixation operation treatment is quite worthwhile to be promoted clinicaly.