期刊文献+

我国近十年课程研究热点与反思——基于CiteSpace的分析 被引量:31

Reflections of the Hotspots of the Resent Ten Years in Curriculum Research——Based on Analysis of the Data of CiteSpace
下载PDF
导出
摘要 运用文献计量软件Cite Space对中国知网2004—2013年的课程研究相关论文数据进行转换分析制图发现,我国近十年课程研究的热点呈现如下特点:从内容上看,热点主题有基础教育阶段的课程、教学方法、教学改革、校本课程等和高等教育阶段的实践教学及课程设计、创新、开发与建设等;从时间上看,研究在2004—2007年处于涌现期、2007—2011年进入休眠期、2011—2013年进入平稳发展期;从类型上看,热点主题可以分为两类,渐增型热点如教学改革、高职等和平稳型热点如教师教育、学科研究等。今后研究者须强化研究的问题意识和系统意识,促成课程理论研究与学科课程应用研究之间的良性互动。 Through the literature metrological software, CiteSpace, the author does a research on papers of CNKI(Chinese National Knowledge Internet) about curriculum and gets a relative data which finds that the hot spots of the research represent following features : from the perspective of content, the hot spots mainly contain curriculums, teaching methods, educational reform, school-based curriculums etc. in the basic education and practical teaching, relating curriculum aspects-curriculum design, innovation, development and construction which are included in the higher education; from the time, educational research in China lies in the Emergency Period (2004-2007), the Rest Period (2007-2011 ), the Mastery Period (2011-2013) ;from the type, the hot spots are divided into two categories- increasing popular type and remaining popular type respectively. The former includes teaching reform, higher vocational education and so on. The latter consists of teacher' s education, disciplinary study and so on. In the future, researchers should emphasize the consciousness of the problem and system and urge a result of effective interaction between curriculum theoretical study and discipline practical study.
机构地区 江苏大学
出处 《现代教育管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第3期89-93,共5页 Modern Education Management
关键词 课程研究 热点 反思 CITESPACE curriculum research hotspots reflections CiteSpace
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献93

  • 1冯璐,冷伏海.共词分析方法理论进展[J].中国图书馆学报,2006,32(2):88-92. 被引量:560
  • 2蒋颖.1995~2004年文献计量学研究的共词分析[J].情报学报,2006,25(4):504-512. 被引量:90
  • 3Kleinberg J.Bursty and hierarchical structure in streams.Proceedings of Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining(pp.91-101),Edmonton,Alberta,Canada:ACM Press,2002.
  • 4Freeman L C.Centrality in social networks:Conceptual clarification.Social Networks,1979,1:215-239.
  • 5Price D D.Networks of scientific papers.Science,1965,149:510-515.
  • 6van Raan A.On growth,ageing,and fractal differentiation of science.Scientometrics,2000,47(2):347-362.
  • 7Abt H A.Why some papers have long citation lifetimes.Nature,1998,395:756-757.
  • 8Bak P,Chen K.Self-organized criticality.Scientific American,1991,264(1):46-53.
  • 9Chen C,Morris S.Visualizing evolving networks:Minimum spanning trees versus pathfinder networks.Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization(pp.67-74),Seattle,Washington:IEEE Computer Society Press,2003.
  • 10Small H G,Griffith B C.The structure of scientific literatures i:Identifying and graphing specialties.Science Studies,1974,4:17-40.

共引文献1571

同被引文献592

引证文献31

二级引证文献116

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部