期刊文献+
任意字段
题名或关键词
题名
关键词
文摘
作者
第一作者
机构
刊名
分类号
参考文献
作者简介
基金资助
栏目信息

2014年中期选举及其对美国政治的影响 被引量：2

The 2014 Midterm Election and its Impact on American Politics
原文传递
导出
摘要 美国2014年中期选举是共和党取得全面胜利的一次选举。导致民主党选举失利的因素很多,其中民众对奥巴马支持率下降、对国家前进方向和联邦政府不能有效应对美国面临的外交、经济和社会问题的不满所形成的不利政治环境是主要原因。参议院控制权是本次中期选举两党争夺的重点。共和党夺回对参议院控制权所形成的两党分别控制白宫和国会的"分裂政府"格局将对奥巴马第二任期最后两年的政策议程形成掣肘,从而进一步加剧业已激化的府会冲突,导致更多的立法和政策僵局。选举的结果还进一步加强了共和党"南部化"的趋势,引发了民主党内部在政策上和策略上的分歧,进一步加剧州政治的"极化"。 The GOP won a complete victory in the 2014 Midterm Election.For Democratic electoral losses,the key reason among others is unfavorable political environment caused by voters' declining support for President Obama,by their dissatisfaction with the direction the nation is heading,and the federal government's failure in dealing with political,economic,and diplomatic problems the country faces.To take control of the Senate is the key battle in the 2014 election.The political pattern of the 'divided government',in which one party controls the Congress and the other controls the White House after Republicans hold the Senate,will curb Obama's policy agenda in his final two years of presidency,and intensify the executive and congressional conflict,which will reach more legislative deadlock and policymaking stalemate.The 2014 Midterm Election has also solidified the trend of the Republican 'southernization' and increased the polarization of state politics.
作者 张业亮
机构地区 清华大学中美关系研究中心
出处 《美国研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第1期86-104,7,共19页 The Chinese Journal of American Studies
关键词 美国政治 国会 中期选举2014年 共和党民主党
分类号 D771.2 [政治法律—中外政治制度]
  • 引文网络
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献117

  • 1Barbara Sinclair, "Congressional Parties and the Policy," in L. Sandy Maisel ed. , The Parties Respond: Changes in American Parties and Campaigns (Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, 2002), p. 211.
  • 2Barbara Sinclair, Party Wars: Polarization and the Politics of National Policy Making, p. 5.
  • 3Jon R. Bond and Richard Fleisher eds. , Polarized Politics: Congress and the President in a Partisan Era (Washington, D. C. : CP Press, 2000), pp. 3-4.
  • 4Norman J. Ornstein, Thomas E. Mann, and Michael J. Malbin eds. , Vital Statistics on Congress, 1993 1994 (Washington D. C. : CQ Press, 1994), pp. 201-202.
  • 5Bruce Miroff, Raymond Seidelman and Todd Wwanstrom eds. , The Democratic Debate: An Introduction to American Politics (Boston and New York: Houghton Mifflin Company, 2002), p. 309.
  • 6Nolan McCarty, Keith T. Poole, and Howard Rosenthal eds. , Polarized American: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches (MIT Press, 2006), p. 15.
  • 7William G. Mayer, The Divided Democrats: Ideological Unity, Party Reform, and Presidential Election (Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, 1996), pp. 96-97.
  • 8Pietro S. Nivola and David W. Brady, eds. , Redand Blue Nation, p. 16.
  • 9David M. Shribman, "Subtle Shifts," in L. Sandy Maisel ed. , The Parties Respond: Changes in American Parties and Campaigns (Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, 2001), p. 296.
  • 10Walter Dean Burnham, "The Changing Shape of the American Party in Transition," American Political Science Review, Vol. 59, No. 1, March 1965.

共引文献58

同被引文献140

  • 1《IPCC报告强调气候变化危害人类安全》,http://news.xinhuanet.com/2014-03/31/c_1110032555.htm,访问日期:2014年4月19日.
  • 2Alice M. Rivlin , Revising the AmericanDream: The Economy, The States, The Federal Government ( Washington, D. C. , The Brookings Institution Press, 1992 ).
  • 3Sandra Osboum, "Federalism : Key Episodes in the History of the American Federal System," CRS Report, 82139, August 16, 1982.
  • 4Baker v. Carr,369 U.S. 186 (1962).
  • 5Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S.436 (1966).
  • 6Lovingv. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (1967).
  • 7Kenneth Jost, "States and Federalism: Is the Federal Government Usurping States' Powers?" CQ Researcher, Oct. 15, 2010, Vol. 20, No. 36, pp. 845 - 868.
  • 8Gonzales v. Oregon, 546 U.S. 243 (2006).
  • 9The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, Pub. L. No. 111 - 5, 123 Stat.
  • 10The Troubled Asset Relief Program Act) ,Pub. L. No. 110 -343.

引证文献2

二级引证文献26

美国研究
2015年 第1期
职称评审材料打包下载

相关作者

相关机构

相关主题

;
使用帮助 返回顶部