期刊文献+

Evaluation of Eight Different Clinical Staging Systems Associated with Overall Survival of Chinese Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma 被引量:5

Evaluation of Eight Different Clinical Staging Systems Associated with Overall Survival of Chinese Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma
原文传递
导出
摘要 Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common cancer in China, an area of high hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Although several staging systems are available, there is no consensus on the best classification to use because multiple factors, such as etiology, clinical treatment and populations could affect the survival of HCC patients. Methods: This study analyzed 743 HBV-related Chinese HCC patients who received surgery first and evaluated the predictive values of eight different commonly used staging systems in the clinic. Results: The overall 1-, 3-, 5-year survival rates and a median survival were 91.5%, 70.3%, 55.3% and 72 months respectively. Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging systems had the best stratification ability and showed the lowest Akaike information criterion (AIC) values (2896.577), followed by tumor-node-metastasis Th (TNM 7^th) (AIC = 2899.980), TNM 6th (AIC = 2902.17), Japan integrated staging score (A1C = 2918.085), Tokyo (AIC = 2938.822), Cancer of the Liver Italian Program score (AIC = 2941.950), Chinese University Prognostic Index grade (AIC = 2962.027), and Okuda (AIC = 2979.389). Conclusions: BCLC staging system is a better staging model for HBV infection patients with HCC in Chinese population among the eight currently used staging systems. These identifications afford a large group of Chinese HCC patients with HBV infection and could be helpful to design a new staging system for a certain population. Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common cancer in China, an area of high hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Although several staging systems are available, there is no consensus on the best classification to use because multiple factors, such as etiology, clinical treatment and populations could affect the survival of HCC patients. Methods: This study analyzed 743 HBV-related Chinese HCC patients who received surgery first and evaluated the predictive values of eight different commonly used staging systems in the clinic. Results: The overall 1-, 3-, 5-year survival rates and a median survival were 91.5%, 70.3%, 55.3% and 72 months respectively. Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging systems had the best stratification ability and showed the lowest Akaike information criterion (AIC) values (2896.577), followed by tumor-node-metastasis Th (TNM 7^th) (AIC = 2899.980), TNM 6th (AIC = 2902.17), Japan integrated staging score (A1C = 2918.085), Tokyo (AIC = 2938.822), Cancer of the Liver Italian Program score (AIC = 2941.950), Chinese University Prognostic Index grade (AIC = 2962.027), and Okuda (AIC = 2979.389). Conclusions: BCLC staging system is a better staging model for HBV infection patients with HCC in Chinese population among the eight currently used staging systems. These identifications afford a large group of Chinese HCC patients with HBV infection and could be helpful to design a new staging system for a certain population.
出处 《Chinese Medical Journal》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2015年第3期316-321,共6页 中华医学杂志(英文版)
关键词 Chinese Population Clinical Staging Ssystem Hepatocellular Carcinoma SURVIVAL Chinese Population Clinical Staging Ssystem Hepatocellular Carcinoma Survival
  • 相关文献

参考文献35

  • 1Hsu CY, Hsia CY, Huang YH, Su CW, Lin HC, Lee PC, etal. Selecting an optimal staging system br hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of 5 currently used prognostic models. Cancer 2010, 116:3006-14.
  • 2Moore SW, Millar A J, Hadley GP, Ionescu G, Kruger M, Poole J, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma and liver tumors in South African children: A case for increased prevalence. Cancer 2004, 101:642-9.
  • 3El-Scrag HB, Davila JA, Petersen N J, McGlynn KA. The continuing increase in the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in the United States: an update. Ann Intern Med 2003,139:817-23.
  • 4Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2011,61:6%90.
  • 5Chen TW, Chu CM, Yu JC, Chert C J, Chan DC, Liu YC, et al. Comparison of clinical staging systems in predicting survival of hepatocellular carcinoma patients receiving major or minor hepatectomy. Eur J Surg Oncol 2007,33:480-7.
  • 6Green F. Liver (including intrahepatic bile ducts). In: Green F, Fleming I, editos. AJCC Cancer Staging Handbook. 6h ed. New York: Springer, 2002. p. 131-44.
  • 7Edge SB, Compton. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 7'h ed. Chicago: Springer, 2009: 237.
  • 8Okuda K, Ohtsuki T, Obata H, Tomimatsu M, Okazaki N, Hasegawa H, et al. Natural history of hepatocellular carcinoma and prognosis in relation to treatment. Study of 850 patients. Cancer 1985,56:918-28.
  • 9A new prognostic system for hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective study of 435 patients: The Cancer of the Liver Italian Program (CLIP) investigators. Hepatology 1998,28:751-5.
  • 10Llovet JM, Brfi C, Bruix J. Prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: the BCLC staging classification. Semin Liver Dis 1999, 19:329-38.

同被引文献23

引证文献5

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部