期刊文献+

Carbon stocks of different land uses in the Kumrat valley, Hindu Kush Region of Pakistan 被引量:8

Carbon stocks of different land uses in the Kumrat valley, Hindu Kush Region of Pakistan
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Changes in land use cover, particularly from forest to agriculture, is a major contributing factor in increasing carbon dioxide(CO2) level in the atmosphere.Using satellite images of 1999 and 2011, land use and land use changes in the Kumrat valley KPK, Pakistan, were determined: a net decrease of 11.56 and 7.46 % occurred in forest and rangeland, while 100 % increase occurred in agriculture land(AL). Biomass in different land uses,forest land(FL), AL, and range land(RL) was determined by field inventory. From the biomass data, the amount of carbon was calculated, considering 50 % of the biomass as carbon. Soil carbon was also determined to a depth of 0–15and 16–30 cm. The average carbon stocks(C stocks) in all land uses ranged from 28.62 ± 13.8 t ha-1in AL to486.6 ± 32.4 t ha-1in pure Cedrus deodara forest. The results of the study confirmed that forest soil and vegetation stored the maximum amount of carbon followed by RL. Conversion of FL and RL to AL not only leads to total loss of about 56 %(from FL conversion) and 37 %(RL conversion) of soil carbon in the last decades but also the loss of a valuable carbon sink. In order to meet the emissions reduction obligations of the Kyoto Protocol, Conservation of forest and RL in the mountainous regions of the Hindu Kush will help Pakistan to meet its emissions reduction goals under the Kyoto Protocol. Changes in land use cover, particularly from forest to agriculture, is a major contributing factor in increasing carbon dioxide(CO2) level in the atmosphere.Using satellite images of 1999 and 2011, land use and land use changes in the Kumrat valley KPK, Pakistan, were determined: a net decrease of 11.56 and 7.46 % occurred in forest and rangeland, while 100 % increase occurred in agriculture land(AL). Biomass in different land uses,forest land(FL), AL, and range land(RL) was determined by field inventory. From the biomass data, the amount of carbon was calculated, considering 50 % of the biomass as carbon. Soil carbon was also determined to a depth of 0–15and 16–30 cm. The average carbon stocks(C stocks) in all land uses ranged from 28.62 ± 13.8 t ha-1in AL to486.6 ± 32.4 t ha-1in pure Cedrus deodara forest. The results of the study confirmed that forest soil and vegetation stored the maximum amount of carbon followed by RL. Conversion of FL and RL to AL not only leads to total loss of about 56 %(from FL conversion) and 37 %(RL conversion) of soil carbon in the last decades but also the loss of a valuable carbon sink. In order to meet the emissions reduction obligations of the Kyoto Protocol, Conservation of forest and RL in the mountainous regions of the Hindu Kush will help Pakistan to meet its emissions reduction goals under the Kyoto Protocol.
出处 《Journal of Forestry Research》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2015年第1期57-64,共8页 林业研究(英文版)
关键词 Hindu Kush Kumrat valley Land uses Biomass Carbon stocks Hindu Kush Kumrat valley Land uses Biomass Carbon stocks
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献35

  • 1Anderson JM, Ingram JSl. 1993. Tropical Soil Fertility: A handbook ofmethods. Wallingford. U.K: CAB, pp. 68-71.
  • 2Bakker JP, Olff H, Willems JH, Zobel M. 1996. Wby do we need permanent plots in the study oflong-term vegetation dynamics? Journal of Vegetation Science,7; 147-156.
  • 3Bell G. 2000. Environmental heterogeneity and species diversity of forest edges. Journal of Ecology, 88: 67-87.
  • 4Birkeland PW. 1984. Soils and Geomorphology. New York: Oxford Univ. Press, p.372.
  • 5Brown S, Lugo AE. 1982. The storage and production of organic matter in tropical forests and their role in the global carbon cycle. Biotropica, 14: 161-187.
  • 6Cairns MA, Brown S, Helmer EH, Baumgardner GA. 1997. Root biomass allocation in the world upland forest. Oecologia, 111: 1-11.
  • 7Chaturvedi OP, Singh JS. 1982. Total biomass and biomass production in Pinus roxburghii trees growing in all aged natural forests. Can J For Res, 12: 632-640.
  • 8Dixon RK, Brown S, Houghton RA, Solomon AM, Trexler MC, Wisniewski J. 1994. Carbon pool and fluxes of global forest ecosystem. Science, 263: 185-190.
  • 9FAO. 2006. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2005 - Progress towards Sustainable Forest Management. FAO Forestry PaperNo. 147.
  • 10Herzog M. 1998. Shrubland Management in Tribal Islamic Yemen. Social Forestry as Development ofa Local and Sustainable (Sylvi) Culture-An Essay in Practical Philosophy. Rheinfelden, Switzerland.

共引文献4

同被引文献103

引证文献8

二级引证文献41

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部