期刊文献+

Use of nerve elongator to repair short-distance peripheral nerve defects: a prospective randomized study 被引量:4

Use of nerve elongator to repair short-distance peripheral nerve defects: a prospective randomized study
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Repair techniques for short-distance peripheral nerve defects, including adjacent joint flexion to reduce the distance between the nerve stump defects, "nerve splint" suturing, and nerve sle eve connection, have some disadvantages. Therefore, we designed a repair technique involving intraoperative tension-free application of a nerve elongator and obtained good outcomes in the repair of short-distance peripheral nerve defects in a previous animal study. The present study compared the clinical outcomes between the use of this nerve elongator and performance of the conventional method in the repair of short-distance transection injuries in human elbows. The 3-, 6-, and 12-month postoperative follow-up results demonstrated that early neurological function recovery was better in the nerve elongation group than in the conventional group, but no signif- icant difference in long-term neurological function recovery was detected between the two gro ups. In the nerve elongation group, the nerves were sutured without tension, and the duration of postoperative immobilization of the elbow was decreased. Elbow function rehabilitation was significantly better in the nerve elongation group than in the control group. Moreover, there were no security risks. The results of this study confirm that the use of this nerve elongator for repair of short-distance peripheral nerve defects is safe and effective. Repair techniques for short-distance peripheral nerve defects, including adjacent joint flexion to reduce the distance between the nerve stump defects, "nerve splint" suturing, and nerve sle eve connection, have some disadvantages. Therefore, we designed a repair technique involving intraoperative tension-free application of a nerve elongator and obtained good outcomes in the repair of short-distance peripheral nerve defects in a previous animal study. The present study compared the clinical outcomes between the use of this nerve elongator and performance of the conventional method in the repair of short-distance transection injuries in human elbows. The 3-, 6-, and 12-month postoperative follow-up results demonstrated that early neurological function recovery was better in the nerve elongation group than in the conventional group, but no signif- icant difference in long-term neurological function recovery was detected between the two gro ups. In the nerve elongation group, the nerves were sutured without tension, and the duration of postoperative immobilization of the elbow was decreased. Elbow function rehabilitation was significantly better in the nerve elongation group than in the control group. Moreover, there were no security risks. The results of this study confirm that the use of this nerve elongator for repair of short-distance peripheral nerve defects is safe and effective.
出处 《Neural Regeneration Research》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2015年第1期79-83,共5页 中国神经再生研究(英文版)
基金 supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China,No.31171150,31271284,81171146,30971526,30801169 the National Program on Key Basic Research Project of China(973 Program),No.2014CB542206 Program for New Star in Science and Technology of Beijing of China,No.A-2008-10 Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University of Ministry of Education of China,No.BMU20110270 the National Natural Science Foundation of China for Distinguished Youth,No.31100860
关键词 nerve regeneration peripheral nerve deficiency nerve elongator British Medical Re-search Council scale neurological function prognosis NSFC grants neural regeneration nerve regeneration peripheral nerve deficiency nerve elongator British Medical Re-search Council scale neurological function prognosis NSFC grants neural regeneration
  • 相关文献

同被引文献29

引证文献4

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部