期刊文献+

基于ICESat/GLAS高度计数据的SRTM数据精度评估——以青藏高原地区为例 被引量:20

Accuracy evaluation of SRTM data based on ICESat / GLAS altimeter data:A case study in the Tibetan Plateau
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为全面了解航天飞机雷达测图计划(shuttle Radar topography mission,SRTM)高程数据的精度及误差特征,利用精度更高的ICESat/GLAS激光高度计数据(简称ICESat高度计数据)为参照数据,以具有多种地貌类型的中国青藏高原地区为实验区,采用双线性插值算法分析了SRTM在中国青藏高原地区的高程精度,以及SRTM高程数据与地形因子(坡度和坡向)间的关系。实验结果表明:在青藏高原地区,ICESat高度计数据与相对应的SRTM高程数据高度相关,相关系数高达0.999 8;SRTM的系统误差为2.36±16.48 m,中误差(RMSE)为16.65 m;当坡度低于25°时,SRTM高程数据精度随坡度增大而显著降低。此外,相对于ICESat高度计数据,SRTM在青藏高原地区N,NW和NE方向的测量值偏高,在S,SE和SW方向的测量值偏低。 To understand the accuracy and error characteristics of the shuttle Radar topography mission ( SRTM ) elevation data,the authors used the more precise ICESat/GLAS laser altimeter data as reference data in the Tibetan Plateau covering various landscape types so as to assess the accuracy of SRTM and explore the relationship between SRTM and terrain factors ( slope and aspect ) through bilinear interpolation algorithm. The experimental results show that ICESat altimeter data are highly correlated with SRTM data, with a correlation coefficient of 0. 999 8. The system error of SRTM is 2. 36 ± 16. 48 m,with a RMSE of 16. 65 m. The accuracy of SRTM data decreases obviously as the slope increases when the slope is lower than 25°. In addition, compared with ICESat altimeter data, the measurements of SRTM elevation are higher in the north, northwest and northeast directions, and lower in the south, southeast and southwest directions in the Tibetan Plateau.
出处 《国土资源遥感》 CSCD 北大核心 2015年第1期100-105,共6页 Remote Sensing for Land & Resources
基金 中国科学院对地观测与数字地球科学中心主任创新基金项目"星载高度计数据陆地应用研究"(编号:Y2ZZ17101B) 中欧"龙计划-3"项目"青藏高原冰川高程与湖泊水位变化监测"(编号:ID.10466)共同资助
关键词 航天飞机雷达测图计划(SRTM) 双线性插值 坡度 坡向 ICESat/GLAS ICESat/GLAS bilinear interpolation algorithm slope aspect
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Carabajal C C, Harding D J. ICESat validation of SRTM C - band digital elevation models [ J ]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2005, 32(22) :L22S01.1 - L22S01.5.
  • 2Zhang G Q,Xie H J,Kang S C,et al. Monitoring lake level changes on the Tibetan Plateau using ICESat altimetry data( 2003 - 2009 ) [ J ]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2011,115 ( 7 ) : 1733 - 1742.
  • 3Hirt C, Filmer M S, Featherstone W E. Comparison and validation of the recent freely - available ASTER - GDEM verl, SRTM ver 4.1 and GEODATA DEM -9S ver3 digital elevation models over Australia[ J ]. Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, 2010,57 ( 3 ) : 337 - 347.
  • 4Braun A, Fotopoulos G. Assessment of SRTM, ICESat and survey control monument elevations in Canada[ J]. Photogrammetric Engi- neering and Remote Sensing,2007,73 (12) : 1333 - 1342.
  • 5Beaulieu A, Claret D. Accuracy assessment of Canadian digital ele- vation data using ICESat [ J ]. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing,2009,75 ( 1 ) : 81 - 86.
  • 6Rodriguez E, Morris C S, Belz J E. A global assessment of the SRTM performance[ J]. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing,2006,72 ( 3 ) :249 - 260.
  • 7Schutz B E, Zwally H J, Shuman C A, et al. Overview of the ICESat Mission [ J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2005, 32 ( 21 ) : L21S01.1 - L21S01.4.
  • 8Farr T G, Rosen P A, Caw E, et al. The shuttle radar toiography mission [ J ]. Reviews of Geophysics, 2007,45 ( 2 ) : RG2(J04.1 - RG2004.33.
  • 9黄海兰.利用ICESat和GRACE卫星观测数据确定极地冰盖变化[D].武汉:武汉大学,2011.
  • 10Zhao S M, Cheng W M, Zhou C H, et al. Accuracy assessment of the ASTER GDEM and SRTM3 DEM:An example in the Loess Plateau and North China Plain of China[ J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing,2011,32 (23) :8081 - 8093.

同被引文献129

引证文献20

二级引证文献149

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部