期刊文献+

运动平板Duke评分诊断冠心病的价值 被引量:4

The value of Duke treadmill score in coronary heart disease
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨运动试验中Duke评分对冠心病的诊断价值.方法 对94例行冠状动脉造影患者行运动试验,并计算出Duke评分,分析Duke评分与冠状动脉造影间的相关性.结果 Duke评分对男性及女性冠心病诊断的准确性、阳性预测值分别为:88.9%、85.0%;89.6%、82.5%,与传统的心电图ST段改变的标准相比,差异有统计学意义(x2 =4.27,P<0.05).结论 Duke对冠心病的诊断,在准确性、阳性预测值等方面要明显优于心电图ST段压低标准. Objective To discuss the value of Duke treadmill score in the diagnosis of coronary heart disease.Methods 94 inpatients underwent treadmill test and coronary angiography,the relationship between the Duke treadmill score and the results of coronary angiography was analyzed.Results The prognostic accuracy and positive predictive value of Duke treadmill score to male and female were 88.9%,85.0% ;those of traditional electrocardiogram ST standard were 89.6%,82.5 %,the differences were significant (x2 =4.27,P 〈 0.05).Conclusion The Duke treadmill score is much more significant than the traditional ST standard in the prognostic accuracy and positive predictive value of diagnosing coronary heart disease.
出处 《中国基层医药》 CAS 2015年第4期551-553,共3页 Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
关键词 运动试验 冠状动脉造影 DUKE评分 冠心病 Treadmill exercise test Coronary angiography Duke treadmill score Coronary heart disease
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献62

共引文献52

同被引文献36

  • 1Tauth J, Sullebarger JT. Myocardial infarction associated with my- ocardial bridging:case history and review of the literature [ J]. Cath Cardiovasc Diagn, 1997,40 ( 4 ) : 364-367. DOI : 10. 1002/ (SICI) 1097-0304( 199704)40:4 < 364 : AID-CCD9 > 3.0. CO;2-7.
  • 2Silva AM. Prevalence and factors associated with inappropriate use of treadmill exercise stress test for coronary artery disease : a cross-sectional study [ J ]. BMC Cardiovasc Disord, 2015.15 : 54. DOI : 10.1186/s12872-015-0048-7.
  • 3Mohlenkamp S, Hort W, Ge J, et al. Update on myocardial bridg- ing. Circulation. 2002 ; 106 : 2616-2622. DOI: 10.1161/01. CIR. 0000038420. 14867.7A.
  • 4Yano K,Yoshino H,Taniuchi M,et al. Myocardial bridging of the LAD in acute inferior wall myocardial infarction [ J ]. Clin Cardi- ol,2001,24:202-208. DOI : 10. 1002/clc. 4960240306.
  • 5Erbel R, Ge J, Mohlenkamp S. Myocardial bridging: a congenital variant as an anatomic risk factor for myocardial infarction [ J ]. Circulation,2009,120:35%359. DOI: 10. ll61/circulationaha. 109. 881367.
  • 6Marchionni N, Chechi T, Falai M, et al. Myocardial stunning asso- ciated with a myocardial bridge [ J ]. Int J Cardiol,2002,82 (1) : 65-67. DOI:IO. 1016/S0167-5273 (01)00580-0.
  • 7Erbel R, Rupprecht HJ, Ge J, et al. Coronary artery shape and flow changes induced by myocardial bridging. Assessment by in- travascular ultrasound [ J ]. Echocardiography, 1993,10 ( 1 ) : 71 - 77.
  • 8Bourassa MG, Butnaru A, Lesp6rance J, et al. Symptomatic myo- cardial bridges:overview of ischemic mechanisms and current di- agnostic and treatment strategies[ J]. J Am Coll Cardio1,2003,41 (2) :351-359. DOI:10. 1016/S0735-1097(02)02768-7.
  • 9Ishii T, Asuwa N, Masuda S, et al. The effects of a myocardial bridge on coronary atherosclerosis and ischemia [ J ]. J Pathol, 1998,185:4-9. DOI : 10. 1002/(SICI) 1096-9896 ( 199805 ) 185 : 1 <4 :AID-PATI-IS0 >3.0. CO;2-3.
  • 10Konen E, Goitein O, Sternik L, et al. The prevalence and anatomi- cal patterns of intramuscular coronary arteries : a coronary compu- ted tomography angiographic study[ J]. Am Coil Cardio1,2007,49 (5) :587-593. DOI:IO. 1016/j. jacc. 2006.09. 039.

引证文献4

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部