期刊文献+

机器人手术系统行胰腺钩突肿瘤切除术疗效评价(附6例报告) 被引量:5

The efficacy evaluation for pancreatic uncinate process tumor resection by using the robotic operation system:A report of 6 patients
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨机器人手术系统行胰腺钩突肿瘤切除术的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析自2010年12月至2013年12月上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院完成的6例机器人手术系统辅助胰腺钩突肿瘤切除术的临床资料。结果 6例手术均顺利完成,无中转开腹。病人平均年龄51.7(40~64)岁,男性3例,女性3例。平均手术时间143.3(100~200)min;平均术中出血80(30~150)m L;平均术后住院天数23.8(13~44)d;术后2例出现B级胰瘘,1例出现C级胰瘘及肺部感染;无死亡病例。术后病理检查报告:4例为导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤(IPMT),1例为胰岛素瘤,1例为实性假乳头状瘤(SPT)。术后常规随访:根据手术时间分别随访2个月至2年,术后均未因相关并发症再次入院,均未发现肿瘤复发。结论机器人手术系统辅助胰腺钩突肿瘤切除术安全可行,成功率高,较传统开腹手术及腹腔镜手术,具有一定优势,但术后出现胰瘘等并发症概率仍较高。 ObjectiveTo evaluate the clinical effect of pancreatic uncinate process tumor resection by using therobotic operation system.MethodsThe clinical data of 6 patients who underwent pancreatic uncinate processtumorresection between December 2010 and December 2012 in Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao TongUniversity School of Medicine were analyzed retrospectively.ResultsAll the surgeries were finished well with noconversion to laparotomy. The average age was 51.7 years old(40-64). Three patients were male and 3 were female. Theaverage operation time was 143.3(100-200)min. The average bleeding during surgery was 80(30-150)m L. The averagehospital stay after surgery was 23.8d(13-44d). Two patients suffered pancreatic leak(grade B) while 1 patient sufferedpancreatic leak(grade C) and pulmonary infection,but no patient dead. The pathology results:4 patients were IPMT,1patient was islet cell tumor,the other one was SPT. After follow up from 2 months to 2 years,no patient came back tohospital again and there was no reoccurrence of tumors.ConclusionPancreatic uncinate process tumor resection byusing robotic operation system is safe also with a high success rate. Compared with open or laparoscopic surgery,it hasmore advantages. However,the occurrence rate of pancreatic fistula after surgery is still high.
出处 《中国实用外科杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2015年第3期308-312,共5页 Chinese Journal of Practical Surgery
关键词 胰腺钩突肿瘤 达芬奇机器人手术系统 局部切除术 pancreatic uncinate process tumors Da VinciTMrobotic operation system local resection
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献4

共引文献29

同被引文献42

  • 1Ejaz A, Sachs T, He J, et al. A comparison of open and minimallyinvasive surgery for hepatic and pancreatic resection using thenationwide inpatient sample. Surgery ,2014,156 ( 3 ) :538 -547.
  • 2Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M, et al. Robotics in generalsurgery : personal experience in a large community hospital. ArchSurg,2003,138(7) ,111 -784.
  • 3Cheng K, Shen BY, Peng CH, et al. Initial experiences inrobotassisted middle-pancreatectomy. HPB ,2013, 15 ( 4 ) : 315 -321.
  • 4Stafford AT, Walsh RM. Robotic surgery of the pancreas: thecurrent state of the art. J Surg Oncol ,2015,112(3) :289 - 294.
  • 5Jones A , Sethia K. Robotic surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl,2010,92(1) :5 -13 .
  • 6Kandil E, Noureldine SI, Saggi B , et al. Robotic live resection :initial experience with three-arm robotic and single-port robotictechnique. JSLS,2013,17(1) :56 -6 2.
  • 7Giulianotti PC, Sbrana F , Bianco FM, et al. Robot-assistedlaparoscopic pancreatic surgery: single-surgeon experience. SurgEndosc,2010 ,24(7) : 1646 - 1657.
  • 8Waters JA, Canal DF, Wiebke EA, et al. Robotic distalpancreatectomy: cost effective- Surgery ,2010,148 (4 ) :814 - 823.
  • 9Zeh HJ, Zureikat AH, Secrest A , et al. Outcomes after robotassistedpancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary lesions. AnnSurg Oncol,2012,19(3) :864 -870.
  • 10Oin H , Qiu JG, Zhao YY, et al. Does minimally-invasivepancreaticoduodectomy have advantages over its open method- Ameta-analysis of retrospective studies. PloS One, 2014, 9 ( 8 ) :e104274.

引证文献5

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部