期刊文献+

“艳照反腐”的证据法问题分析

The Analysis of the Law of Evidence of “Anti-corruption via Official Sexual Photos”
下载PDF
导出
摘要 近年来随着网络媒体的极速发展,"艳照反腐"似已成为揭露贪腐犯罪的盛行方式,但当我们为由此带来的近乎立竿见影的反腐效果而欢欣鼓舞时,从刑事证据的角度出发,也应看到官员艳照的证据资格、证明力和人权保障问题并不是具有天然的正当性,都还有待思考和讨论。首先,官员艳照因不符合关联性标准与合法性标准而不具有进入刑事诉讼的证据资格;而且,在不考虑证据资格问题的前提下,由于官员艳照的客观真实性也无法保障,加之关联性欠缺,导致其证明力也受到影响;此外,艳照曝光以披露个人隐私为必要,有侵犯人权之嫌,易使当事人尤其是女性当事人陷入难以摆脱的困境。故而"艳照喧嚣"之后,亟须对这场"反腐热潮"进行冷静反思,司法实务中应更加注意以严格的证据标准来把握艳照问题,以免"艳照反腐"误入歧途。 With the fast development of network media in recent years, "anti - corruption via official sexual photos" seems to have become a prevalent way of exposing corruption crime, but when appreciating the immediate effect, from the perspective of the law of criminal evidence, we should also find out that the qualification, the degree of proof and human rights problems involved are not soundly reasonable so that we need to make a discussion. First of all, because the official sexual photos are not in conformity with the standards of the relevance and legitimacy, these photos can not enter the criminal procedure ; and regardless of the relevance standard, the official photos of objective authenticity cannot be guaranteed, so the degree of proof has also been affected. In addition, the exposure of official sexual photos takes disclosing privacy for granted, so it is easy to violate human rights. So in the criminal procedure the judicial office should pay more attention to strictly controlling all the standards of criminal evidence in order to protect "anti -corruption via official sexual photos" from going astray.
出处 《河南警察学院学报》 2015年第1期84-87,共4页 Journal of Henan Police College
关键词 艳照反腐 关联性 合法性 客观真实性 人权保障 anti -corruption via official sexual photos the relevance of evidence the degree of proof objec- tive authenticity the guarantee of human rights
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献18

  • 1陈桂明,计格非.民事诉讼证据合法性的重新解读[J].国家检察官学院学报,2005,13(2):99-104. 被引量:15
  • 2何家弘.论证据的基本范畴[J].法学杂志,2007,28(1):28-33. 被引量:26
  • 3[苏]H.B.蒂里切夫等编著.苏维埃刑事诉讼[M].北京:法律出版社,1984.
  • 4周文水.私家侦探,游走在法律边缘[EB/OL].人民网.http://www.people.com.cn/GB/paper83/919l/853754.html.
  • 5[美]理查德·A·波斯纳著.《证据法的经济分析》.徐昕等译.中国法制出版社,2001年版,第87页.
  • 6[苏]切里佐夫.苏维埃刑事诉讼[M].中国人民大学刑法教研室译.北京:法律出版社,1955.
  • 7恩格斯:《马克思恩格斯选集》第3卷,人民出版社,1972年版
  • 8林钰雄.刑事诉讼法(上)[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2005:111.
  • 9巫宇甦主编.《证据学》(高等学校法学试用教材),群众出版社1983年版,第144页.
  • 10何家弘主绵.《新编证据法学》,法律出版社2000年出版.

共引文献56

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部